PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXD vs. FLJJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXD vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than FLJJ's 4.98% return.


SIXD

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.79%
YTD
6.99%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLJJ

1D
-0.00%
1M
1.88%
YTD
4.98%
6M
5.80%
1Y
15.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXD vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXD and FLJJ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.95

SIXD vs. FLJJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXD
FLJJ

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SIXD
36.2%
FLJJ
36.2%

Financial Services

SIXD
11.9%
FLJJ
11.9%

Communication Services

SIXD
10.9%
FLJJ
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXD
10.1%
FLJJ
10.1%

Healthcare

SIXD
8.4%
FLJJ
8.4%

Industrials

SIXD
8.1%
FLJJ
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SIXD
4.9%
FLJJ
4.9%

Energy

SIXD
3.5%
FLJJ
3.5%

Utilities

SIXD
2.3%
FLJJ
2.3%

Real Estate

SIXD
1.9%
FLJJ
1.9%

Basic Materials

SIXD
1.8%
FLJJ
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXD vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXD

FLJJ
FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXD vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIXD vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXDFLJJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.20

2.14

+0.07

Drawdowns

SIXD vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum FLJJ drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and FLJJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXDFLJJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-6.91%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.05%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-0.78%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

Volatility

SIXD vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXDFLJJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.36%

5.10%

+2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.36%

6.21%

+1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.36%

6.21%

+1.15%

SIXD vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXD and FLJJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

SIXD vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXD nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SIXD and FLJJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIXD and FLJJ have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

SIXD and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SIXD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FLJJ is Options Trading.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXD and FLJJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer