FLJJ vs. KPRO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLJJ (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF) and KPRO (KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FLJJ returned 11.66% vs -3.07% for KPRO. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLJJ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KPRO.

Performance

FLJJ vs. KPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) and KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJJ achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than KPRO's -4.06% return.

FLJJ

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.48%
• 6M: 5.19%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 1Y: 11.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.77%

KPRO

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 1.80%
• 6M: -5.11%
• YTD: -4.06%
• 1Y: -3.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	$52.96K	$36.05K	$176.13K
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	$43.77K	$23.76K	$121.31K

FLJJ vs. KPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	5.93%	11.35%	13.07%
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	-4.06%	7.79%	11.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJJ and KPRO is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024	0.31

Return for Risk

FLJJ vs. KPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

KPRO

KPRO Risk / Return Rank: 7
KPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
KPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
KPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
KPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLJJ vs. KPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) and KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLJJ	KPRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	-0.35	+2.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	-0.38	+3.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	0.94	+0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	-0.24	+3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.93	-0.41	+15.34

FLJJ vs. KPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the KPRO Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJJ and KPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLJJ vs. KPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJJ drawdown since its inception was -6.91%, smaller than the maximum KPRO drawdown of -13.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJJ and KPRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJJ	KPRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.91%	-13.34%	+6.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.86%	-13.34%	+9.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-10.93%	+10.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-3.02%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.74%	7.70%	-6.96%

Volatility

FLJJ vs. KPRO - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) has a higher volatility of 1.56% compared to KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) at 1.40%. This indicates that FLJJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJJ	KPRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.56%	1.40%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.92%	4.69%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.71%	8.86%	-4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.13%	7.67%	-1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.13%	7.67%	-1.54%

FLJJ vs. KPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJJ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than KPRO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLJJ vs. KPRO - Dividend Comparison

FLJJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	2.76%	2.65%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLJJ and KPRO in my portfolio?

FLJJ and KPRO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLJJ or KPRO?

FLJJ has higher volatility (1.56%) compared to KPRO (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJJ dropped -6.91% vs KPRO's -13.34%.

Which ETF is better, FLJJ or KPRO?

On 1-year performance, FLJJ leads with 11.66% vs -3.07% for KPRO. On fees, FLJJ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, KPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLJJ or KPRO?

Over the 1-year period, FLJJ has performed better with a 11.66% return vs -3.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLJJ or KPRO?

FLJJ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KPRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLJJ or KPRO?

KPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.00% for FLJJ.

What is the main difference between FLJJ and KPRO?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FLJJ and 0.95% for KPRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.