SIXA vs. USL
SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. SIXA is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXA returned 12.58%/yr vs 17.05%/yr for USL. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIXA charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
SIXA vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.
SIXA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 12.27%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 60.58%
- 6M
- 56.11%
- 1Y
- 56.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
SIXA vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 12.27% | 15.52% | 22.70% | 11.98% | -5.72% | 23.87% | 18.45% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 60.58% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 62.48% | 50.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXA and USL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.19 |
The correlation between SIXA and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIXA vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXA
USL
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXA
USL
-
Technology
SIXA
USL
-
Communication Services
SIXA
USL
-
Healthcare
SIXA
USL
-
Financial Services
SIXA
USL
Industrials
SIXA
USL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SIXA
USL
-
Utilities
SIXA
USL
-
Energy
SIXA
USL
-
Real Estate
SIXA
USL
-
Basic Materials
SIXA
-
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXA vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
SIXA
USL
SIXA vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXA | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 3.39 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 6.85 | +6.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXA | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.99 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.57 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.01 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
SIXA vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXA | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -89.06% | +70.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | -16.76% | +11.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | -23.33% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -33.82% | +15.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -39.10% | +38.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -61.45% | +58.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 8.27% | -6.80% |
Volatility
SIXA vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is 2.48%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that SIXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXA | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 10.57% | -8.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.76% | 23.34% | -16.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.95% | 28.59% | -19.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 30.09% | -17.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 32.34% | -18.98% |
SIXA vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXA vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.00% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXA and USL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to SIXA (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.05% vs 12.58% for SIXA. On fees, SIXA is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.05% return vs 12.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIXA is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
SIXA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.88% for USL.
SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXA and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer