PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXA vs. AMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXA vs. AMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly lower than AMOM's 27.93% return.


SIXA

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.40%
YTD
11.89%
6M
12.48%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*

AMOM

1D
1.02%
1M
12.16%
YTD
27.93%
6M
28.91%
1Y
43.17%
3Y*
28.22%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXA vs. AMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
11.89%15.52%22.70%11.98%-5.72%23.87%18.45%
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
27.93%7.69%35.79%27.06%-26.29%13.08%44.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXA and AMOM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between SIXA and AMOM has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIXA vs. AMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXA
AMOM

Consumer Defensive

23.8%
5.0%

Technology

19.7%
41.9%

Communication Services

13.4%
14.3%

Healthcare

12.7%
7.7%

Financial Services

9.6%
6.2%

Industrials

7.8%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
5.8%

Utilities

5.0%
3.8%

Energy

3.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

2.7%

Consumer Defensive

SIXA
23.8%
AMOM
5.0%

Technology

SIXA
19.7%
AMOM
41.9%

Communication Services

SIXA
13.4%
AMOM
14.3%

Healthcare

SIXA
12.7%
AMOM
7.7%

Financial Services

SIXA
9.6%
AMOM
6.2%

Industrials

SIXA
7.8%
AMOM
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXA
6.7%
AMOM
5.8%

Utilities

SIXA
5.0%
AMOM
3.8%

Energy

SIXA
3.1%
AMOM
1.2%

Real Estate

SIXA
1.4%
AMOM
1.9%

Basic Materials

SIXA

-

AMOM
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXA vs. AMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXA
SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

AMOM
AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXA vs. AMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXAAMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.31

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

11.88

+0.87

SIXA vs. AMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXA Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the AMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXA and AMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXAAMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.01

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.53

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.75

+0.45

Drawdowns

SIXA vs. AMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum AMOM drawdown of -39.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and AMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXAAMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-39.68%

+21.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

-13.10%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-30.26%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-39.68%

+21.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

0.00%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-10.81%

+7.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

3.64%

-2.17%

Volatility

SIXA vs. AMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) is 2.56%, while QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that SIXA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXAAMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

7.11%

-4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

16.71%

-9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94%

21.58%

-12.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.80%

23.74%

-10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.36%

24.95%

-11.59%

SIXA vs. AMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than AMOM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXA vs. AMOM - Dividend Comparison

SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than AMOM's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
0.07%0.09%0.00%0.47%0.72%0.74%24.31%5.51%
SIXA
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF
2.01%2.31%1.62%2.12%2.23%1.63%1.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXA and AMOM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMOM has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to SIXA (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs AMOM's -39.68%.

On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 12.53% vs 12.50% for SIXA. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.

SIXA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AMOM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.75% for AMOM.

SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXA and AMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer