PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIVR vs. XSLR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIVR vs. XSLR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SIVR is traded in USD, while XSLR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XSLR.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -16.88% return, which is significantly higher than XSLR.DE's -22.52% return.


SIVR

1D
1.59%
1M
-21.69%
YTD
-16.88%
6M
-22.35%
1Y
63.38%
3Y*
37.03%
5Y*
17.50%
10Y*
11.29%

XSLR.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-22.06%
YTD
-22.52%
6M
-22.52%
1Y
63.55%
3Y*
37.24%
5Y*
17.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. XSLR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-16.88%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%74.64%
XSLR.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
-22.52%159.51%23.42%-1.22%4.64%-13.49%59.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and XSLR.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020

0.80

The correlation between SIVR and XSLR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIVR vs. XSLR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

XSLR.DE
XSLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. XSLR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIVRXSLR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.31

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

2.90

-0.13

SIVR vs. XSLR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the XSLR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and XSLR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. XSLR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than XSLR.DE's maximum drawdown of -48.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and XSLR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIVRXSLR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.85%

-48.91%

-26.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.92%

-48.91%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.92%

-48.91%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.92%

-48.91%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.29%

-48.19%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.83%

-15.32%

-32.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.98%

21.98%

+1.00%

Volatility

SIVR vs. XSLR.DE - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 15.69% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.DE) at 14.69%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSLR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIVRXSLR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.69%

14.69%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.87%

54.39%

+4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.71%

61.32%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.77%

36.66%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.16%

36.70%

-4.54%

SIVR vs. XSLR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XSLR.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIVR vs. XSLR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIVR nor XSLR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SIVR and XSLR.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSLR.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.

SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while XSLR.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.20% for XSLR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIVR and XSLR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer