SIVR vs. VST
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while VST (Vistra Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SIVR returned 19.07%/yr vs 54.40%/yr for VST. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIVR vs. VST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly higher than VST's -8.13% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -11.18%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 86.32%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
VST
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- -8.13%
- 6M
- -12.74%
- 1Y
- -14.37%
- 3Y*
- 83.39%
- 5Y*
- 54.40%
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -4.75% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
VST Vistra Corp. | -8.13% | 17.66% | 261.52% | 70.73% | 5.08% | 19.57% | -11.87% | 2.46% | 24.95% | 18.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and VST is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
VST
SIVR vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.99 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.38 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | -0.70 | +4.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and VST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -53.32% | -22.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.33% | -38.01% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.33% | -48.80% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.33% | -48.80% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.89% | -31.89% | -10.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -13.72% | -34.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | 20.73% | +0.12% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. VST - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to Vistra Corp. (VST) at 15.14%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.37% | 15.14% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.11% | 37.96% | +21.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.76% | 48.75% | +11.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.48% | 47.97% | -11.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 42.22% | -10.19% |
Dividends
SIVR vs. VST - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.61% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 2.13% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 2.75% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and VST have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to VST (15.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs VST's -53.32%.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and VST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer