SIVR vs. SPMO
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 10.56%/yr vs 19.57%/yr for SPMO. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
SIVR vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -18.61% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.56%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.57% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -30.49%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 1Y
- 57.47%
- 3Y*
- 33.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.45%
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- 6M
- 20.51%
- YTD
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 25.37%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 20.21%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $49.50M | $48.83M | $86.59M | |
| $331.54M | $346.70M | $350.59M |
SIVR vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -18.61% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 21.07% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and SPMO is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SIVR and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
SPMO
SIVR vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.63 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 5.93 | -3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -30.95% | -44.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.27% | -15.64% | -36.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.27% | -20.13% | -32.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.27% | -22.74% | -29.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.27% | -30.95% | -21.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.35% | -11.03% | -39.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.84% | -4.62% | -43.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.28% | 4.29% | +22.99% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.53%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.28% | 10.53% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.47% | 21.52% | +33.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.33% | 23.90% | +37.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.00% | 20.60% | +16.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.26% | 20.92% | +11.34% |
SIVR vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and SPMO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to SPMO (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 19.57% vs 10.56% for SIVR. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while SPMO is Momentum. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer