SIVR vs. SLVRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX).
SIVR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. SLVRX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003.
Performance
SIVR vs. SLVRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIVR vs. SLVRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 5.81% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R | 2.51% | 27.32% | 12.24% | 5.25% | -1.30% | 26.02% | 5.92% | 26.26% | -12.52% | 18.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly higher than SLVRX's 2.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed SLVRX with an annualized return of 17.10%, while SLVRX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.33% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -16.47%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 58.90%
- 1Y
- 123.03%
- 3Y*
- 45.76%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.10%
SLVRX
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIVR vs. SLVRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVRX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. SLVRX — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
SLVRX
SIVR vs. SLVRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIVR | SLVRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 1.59 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 2.13 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 2.26 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 9.58 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIVR | SLVRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.59 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.67 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.66 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.46 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and SLVRX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SIVR vs. SLVRX - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R | 8.29% | 8.50% | 3.27% | 3.42% | 1.15% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.83% | 4.60% | 3.92% | 8.22% | 4.27% |
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. SLVRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than SLVRX's maximum drawdown of -60.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and SLVRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | SLVRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -60.20% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.42% | -12.41% | -30.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | -18.53% | -23.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -41.51% | -0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.45% | -6.87% | -28.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.99% | -7.47% | -40.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.75% | 2.92% | +10.83% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. SLVRX - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.98% compared to Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) at 4.66%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | SLVRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.98% | 4.66% | +12.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.26% | 9.32% | +47.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.02% | 17.08% | +39.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.30% | 15.89% | +19.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.39% | 18.69% | +12.70% |