SIVR vs. SGVT

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. SIVR is passively managed, while SGVT is actively managed. Over the past year, SIVR returned 92.86% vs 3.74% for SGVT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for SGVT.

Performance

SIVR vs. SGVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -1.40% return, which is significantly lower than SGVT's 1.51% return.

SIVR

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: -8.06%
• YTD: -1.40%
• 6M: 9.35%
• 1Y: 92.86%
• 3Y*: 42.25%
• 5Y*: 20.46%
• 10Y*: 14.57%

SGVT

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 1.68%
• 1Y: 3.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. SGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	-1.40%	95.89%
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	1.51%	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and SGVT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

SIVR vs. SGVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 44
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

SGVT

SGVT Risk / Return Rank: 100
SGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. SGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIVR	SGVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	18.33	-16.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	100.91	-99.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	36.10	-34.80
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	138.97	-136.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.44	1,477.41	-1,472.98

SIVR vs. SGVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the SGVT Sharpe Ratio of 18.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and SGVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. SGVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than SGVT's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and SGVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIVR	SGVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.85%	-0.03%	-75.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.33%	-0.03%	-45.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.85%	-0.01%	-39.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.83%	-0.00%	-47.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.00%	0.00%	+21.00%

Volatility

SIVR vs. SGVT - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) at 0.07%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIVR	SGVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.52%	0.07%	+16.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.14%	0.13%	+59.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.96%	0.21%	+59.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.53%	0.21%	+36.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.05%	0.21%	+31.84%

SIVR vs. SGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SGVT's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIVR vs. SGVT - Dividend Comparison

SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%.

Position	TTM	2025
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	3.12%	1.73%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIVR and SGVT in my portfolio?

SIVR and SGVT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIVR or SGVT?

SIVR has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to SGVT (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs SGVT's -0.03%.

Which ETF is better, SIVR or SGVT?

On 1-year performance, SIVR leads with 92.86% vs 3.74% for SGVT. On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SGVT has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIVR or SGVT?

Over the 1-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 92.86% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIVR or SGVT?

SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIVR or SGVT?

SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.

What is the main difference between SIVR and SGVT?

SIVR is categorized as Silver, while SGVT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.28% for SGVT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.33 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.