SIVR vs. RISR
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond. SIVR is passively managed, while RISR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIVR returned 34.54%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for RISR. Their -0.15 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for RISR.
Performance
SIVR vs. RISR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -18.49% return, which is significantly lower than RISR's 4.75% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- 6M
- -27.56%
- YTD
- -18.49%
- 1Y
- 56.49%
- 3Y*
- 34.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.45%
RISR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.20M | $3.07M | $3.51M | |
| $53.73M | $50.42M | $86.10M |
SIVR vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -18.49% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | 4.82% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 4.75% | 4.63% | 24.20% | 7.02% | 31.98% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and RISR is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
RISR
SIVR vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 2.42 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 5.79 | -3.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than RISR's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and RISR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -14.31% | -61.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.27% | -2.61% | -49.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.27% | -8.07% | -44.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.28% | -0.15% | -50.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.84% | -2.12% | -45.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.46% | 1.09% | +26.37% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) at 1.13%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.92% | 1.13% | +9.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.35% | 3.57% | +40.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.45% | 5.25% | +56.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.01% | 11.67% | +25.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.27% | 11.67% | +20.60% |
SIVR vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 5.88% | 5.95% | 5.67% | 7.96% | 4.26% | 0.30% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and RISR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to RISR (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs RISR's -14.31%.
On 3-year performance, SIVR leads with 34.54% vs 10.07% for RISR. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, RISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 34.54% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.
RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while RISR is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 1.13% for RISR.
RISR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and RISR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer