SIVR vs. PL
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while PL (Planet Labs PBC) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SIVR returned 31.44%/yr vs 87.88%/yr for PL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIVR vs. PL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -20.77% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 12.32% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -14.32%
- 6M
- -36.99%
- YTD
- -20.77%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 31.44%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.29%
PL
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -21.54%
- 6M
- -23.04%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 226.22%
- 3Y*
- 87.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.82%
SIVR vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -20.77% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | 3.23% |
PL Planet Labs PBC | 12.32% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -29.27% | -45.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and PL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
PL
SIVR vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 3.99 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | 11.81 | -9.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum PL drawdown of -85.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and PL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -85.11% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.27% | -57.02% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.27% | -57.02% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.66% | -56.91% | +5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -55.19% | +7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.61% | 19.24% | +6.37% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. PL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 12.61%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 24.26%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.61% | 24.26% | -11.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.54% | 73.92% | -17.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.21% | 104.22% | -43.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 84.87% | -47.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.21% | 84.87% | -52.66% |
Dividends
SIVR vs. PL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor PL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and PL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PL has higher volatility (24.26%) compared to SIVR (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs PL's -85.11%.
PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and PL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer