SIVR vs. PL
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while PL (Planet Labs PBC) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SIVR returned 37.03%/yr vs 117.50%/yr for PL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIVR vs. PL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -16.88% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 68.00% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -21.69%
- YTD
- -16.88%
- 6M
- -22.35%
- 1Y
- 63.38%
- 3Y*
- 37.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
PL
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -35.22%
- YTD
- 68.00%
- 6M
- 67.83%
- 1Y
- 443.11%
- 3Y*
- 117.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -16.88% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | 3.23% |
PL Planet Labs PBC | 68.00% | 388.12% | 63.56% | -43.22% | -29.27% | -45.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and PL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
PL
SIVR vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.53 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 9.15 | -7.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 28.19 | -25.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum PL drawdown of -85.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and PL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -85.11% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.92% | -48.83% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.92% | -55.17% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.29% | -35.54% | -13.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -55.27% | +7.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.98% | 15.82% | +7.16% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. PL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 15.69%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 41.66%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | PL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.69% | 41.66% | -25.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.87% | 73.65% | -14.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.71% | 103.54% | -42.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.77% | 85.01% | -48.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 85.01% | -52.85% |
Dividends
SIVR vs. PL - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor PL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and PL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PL has higher volatility (41.66%) compared to SIVR (15.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs PL's -85.11%.
PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and PL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer