SIVR vs. JNJ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 14.22%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SIVR vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 14.22%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.

SIVR

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -22.74%
• YTD: -4.75%
• 6M: 9.46%
• 1Y: 85.68%
• 3Y*: 41.59%
• 5Y*: 19.07%
• 10Y*: 14.22%

JNJ

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: 17.68%
• 6M: 15.11%
• 1Y: 57.60%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 10.94%
• 10Y*: 10.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	-4.75%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.17%	-8.96%	5.97%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	17.68%	47.48%	-4.81%	-8.58%	5.97%	11.44%	10.82%	16.22%	-5.13%	24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and JNJ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009	0.08

The correlation between SIVR and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (3 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SIVR vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 43
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 32

JNJ

JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 96
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 97
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIVR	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	3.42	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	4.94	-3.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.61	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	5.28	-3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	15.52	-11.40

SIVR vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and JNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIVR	JNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.85%	-50.67%	-25.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.33%	-10.96%	-34.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.33%	-15.95%	-29.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.33%	-18.41%	-26.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.33%	-27.37%	-17.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.89%	-2.54%	-39.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.83%	-11.90%	-35.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.85%	3.72%	+17.13%

Volatility

SIVR vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.47%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIVR	JNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.37%	5.47%	+10.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.11%	12.16%	+46.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.76%	16.94%	+42.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.48%	16.87%	+19.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.03%	18.48%	+13.55%

Dividends

SIVR vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	2.18%	2.48%	3.40%	3.00%	2.52%	2.45%	2.53%	2.57%	2.74%	2.38%	2.73%	2.87%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIVR and JNJ in my portfolio?

SIVR and JNJ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIVR or JNJ?

SIVR has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to JNJ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.