PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIVR vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIVR vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -18.61% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 10.56%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.


SIVR

1D
-2.08%
1M
-2.25%
6M
-30.49%
YTD
-18.61%
1Y
57.47%
3Y*
33.21%
5Y*
17.49%
10Y*
10.56%
ALL TIME*
8.45%

IDMO

1D
0.10%
1M
1.32%
6M
6.43%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
25.15%
5Y*
15.47%
10Y*
12.52%
ALL TIME*
9.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.05M$20.41M$22.89M
$49.50M$48.83M$86.59M

SIVR vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-18.61%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-8.96%5.97%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
10.66%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and IDMO is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.24

Over the past year, SIVR and IDMO have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIVR vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIVR vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIVRIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.95

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

7.47

-5.35

SIVR vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIVRIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.85%

-39.38%

-36.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.27%

-12.31%

-39.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.27%

-12.65%

-39.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.27%

-27.07%

-25.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.27%

-31.34%

-20.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.35%

-1.81%

-48.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.84%

-9.68%

-38.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.28%

3.22%

+24.06%

Volatility

SIVR vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) at 7.12%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIVRIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.28%

7.12%

+4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.47%

17.57%

+37.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.33%

19.20%

+42.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.00%

18.24%

+18.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.26%

17.97%

+14.29%

SIVR vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIVR vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.61%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIVR and IDMO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIVR has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to IDMO (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.52% vs 10.56% for SIVR. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.

SIVR is categorized as Silver, while IDMO is Momentum. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIVR and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer