PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIVR vs. FRES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIVR vs. FRES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SIVR is traded in USD, while FRES.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FRES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SIVR having a -16.88% return and FRES.L slightly lower at -17.27%. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed FRES.L with an annualized return of 11.29%, while FRES.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.


SIVR

1D
1.59%
1M
-21.69%
YTD
-16.88%
6M
-22.35%
1Y
63.38%
3Y*
37.03%
5Y*
17.50%
10Y*
11.29%

FRES.L

1D
-1.52%
1M
-17.84%
YTD
-17.27%
6M
-19.22%
1Y
89.41%
3Y*
72.83%
5Y*
30.92%
10Y*
7.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. FRES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-16.88%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-8.96%5.97%
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
-17.27%511.09%4.36%-29.44%-7.20%-19.52%84.40%-20.96%-41.76%30.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and FRES.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009

0.52

The correlation between SIVR and FRES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIVR vs. FRES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FRES.L
FRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. FRES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Fresnillo plc (FRES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIVRFRES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.28

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

5.31

-2.55

SIVR vs. FRES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the FRES.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and FRES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. FRES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum FRES.L drawdown of -86.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and FRES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIVRFRES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.85%

-86.88%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.92%

-38.99%

-11.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.92%

-38.99%

-11.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.92%

-55.86%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.92%

-75.05%

+24.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.29%

-38.99%

-10.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.83%

-48.28%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.98%

16.77%

+6.21%

Volatility

SIVR vs. FRES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 15.69%, while Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) has a volatility of 17.06%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIVRFRES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.69%

17.06%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.87%

45.57%

+13.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.71%

57.89%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.77%

45.68%

-8.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.16%

45.39%

-13.23%

Dividends

SIVR vs. FRES.L - Dividend Comparison

SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
3.47%2.00%1.36%1.98%2.44%2.66%1.00%2.35%3.49%1.73%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIVR and FRES.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIVR and FRES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer