PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIVR vs. ETHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIVR vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly higher than ETHV's -39.43% return.


SIVR

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.85%
6M
24.90%
1Y
110.95%
3Y*
45.38%
5Y*
21.00%
10Y*
15.77%

ETHV

1D
-5.70%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.43%
6M
-42.69%
1Y
-31.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
2.85%145.34%-1.29%
ETHV
VanEck Ethereum ETF
-39.43%-11.02%-3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and ETHV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIVR vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHV
ETHV Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHV Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIVRETHVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

-0.47

+2.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

-0.32

+2.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.97

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

-0.51

+3.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.67

-0.84

+6.51

SIVR vs. ETHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the ETHV Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and ETHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIVRETHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

-0.47

+2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

-0.41

+0.73

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than ETHV's maximum drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and ETHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIVRETHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.85%

-64.02%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.42%

-62.87%

+20.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.25%

-62.87%

+25.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-32.64%

-15.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.64%

37.74%

-18.10%

Volatility

SIVR vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.28% compared to VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) at 9.92%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIVRETHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.28%

9.92%

+6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.30%

46.03%

+12.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.84%

68.43%

-9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.17%

72.30%

-36.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.87%

72.30%

-40.43%

SIVR vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIVR vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIVR nor ETHV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SIVR and ETHV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIVR has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to ETHV (9.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs ETHV's -64.02%.

On 1-year performance, SIVR leads with 110.95% vs -31.70% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 9.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 110.95% return vs -31.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.

SIVR and ETHV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SIVR is categorized as Silver, while ETHV is Cryptocurrency. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.20% for ETHV.

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIVR and ETHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer