SIVR vs. ETHV
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and ETHV (VanEck Ethereum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while ETHV is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SIVR returned 110.95% vs -31.70% for ETHV. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHV.
Performance
SIVR vs. ETHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly higher than ETHV's -39.43% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 24.90%
- 1Y
- 110.95%
- 3Y*
- 45.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
ETHV
- 1D
- -5.70%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 6M
- -42.69%
- 1Y
- -31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR vs. ETHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 2.85% | 145.34% | -1.29% |
ETHV VanEck Ethereum ETF | -39.43% | -11.02% | -3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and ETHV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. ETHV — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
ETHV
SIVR vs. ETHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIVR | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | -0.47 | +2.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | -0.32 | +2.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.97 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | -0.51 | +3.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | -0.84 | +6.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIVR | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | -0.47 | +2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | -0.41 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. ETHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than ETHV's maximum drawdown of -64.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and ETHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -64.02% | -11.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.42% | -62.87% | +20.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.25% | -62.87% | +25.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.85% | -32.64% | -15.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.64% | 37.74% | -18.10% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. ETHV - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.28% compared to VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) at 9.92%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | ETHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.28% | 9.92% | +6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.30% | 46.03% | +12.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.84% | 68.43% | -9.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.17% | 72.30% | -36.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 72.30% | -40.43% |
SIVR vs. ETHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. ETHV - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor ETHV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and ETHV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.28%) compared to ETHV (9.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs ETHV's -64.02%.
On 1-year performance, SIVR leads with 110.95% vs -31.70% for ETHV. On fees, ETHV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ETHV has been the lower-risk option at 9.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 110.95% return vs -31.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETHV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
SIVR and ETHV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while ETHV is Cryptocurrency. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while ETHV tracks MarketVector Ethereum Benchmark Rate. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.20% for ETHV.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and ETHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer