PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIVR vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIVR vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -16.16% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 23.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 11.16%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.


SIVR

1D
-0.33%
1M
-11.29%
6M
-25.37%
YTD
-16.16%
1Y
54.52%
3Y*
36.76%
5Y*
17.63%
10Y*
11.16%

DXJ

1D
1.21%
1M
4.73%
6M
16.90%
YTD
23.45%
1Y
56.35%
3Y*
32.89%
5Y*
27.26%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-16.16%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-8.96%5.97%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
23.45%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and DXJ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009

0.09

Over the past year, SIVR and DXJ have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIVR vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIVRDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.56

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

5.18

-3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

19.76

-17.27

SIVR vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIVRDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.85%

-49.63%

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.92%

-10.98%

-39.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.92%

-22.19%

-28.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.92%

-22.19%

-28.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.92%

-39.14%

-11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.85%

-1.65%

-47.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.83%

-14.28%

-33.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.36%

2.87%

+21.49%

Volatility

SIVR vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 6.74%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIVRDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.32%

6.74%

+7.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.41%

14.43%

+42.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.96%

18.23%

+42.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.83%

19.04%

+17.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.18%

19.94%

+12.24%

SIVR vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIVR vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
0.95%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIVR and DXJ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIVR has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to DXJ (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.85% vs 11.16% for SIVR. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 11.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.

SIVR is categorized as Silver, while DXJ is Japan Equities. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIVR and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer