SIVR vs. ASCI
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while ASCI is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by abrdn. SIVR is passively managed, while ASCI is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ASCI.
Performance
SIVR vs. ASCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly lower than ASCI's 4.49% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -18.43%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 6M
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 69.45%
- 3Y*
- 39.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
ASCI
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR vs. ASCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -13.39% | 37.20% |
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 4.49% | 1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and ASCI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. ASCI — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
ASCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIVR vs. ASCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. ASCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than ASCI's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and ASCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -11.22% | -64.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.16% | -5.47% | -41.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -2.47% | -45.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.88% | — | — |
Volatility
SIVR vs. ASCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.27% | 19.38% | +40.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 19.38% | +17.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.12% | 19.38% | +12.74% |
SIVR vs. ASCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCI's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. ASCI - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.77% | 0.80% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and ASCI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ASCI.
ASCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while ASCI is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.70% for ASCI.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and ASCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer