SIVR vs. ASCI
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while ASCI is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by abrdn. SIVR is passively managed, while ASCI is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ASCI.
Performance
SIVR vs. ASCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly lower than ASCI's 7.39% return.
SIVR
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.85%
- 6M
- 24.90%
- 1Y
- 110.95%
- 3Y*
- 45.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR vs. ASCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 2.85% | 35.42% |
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 7.39% | 1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and ASCI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. ASCI — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
ASCI
SIVR vs. ASCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIVR | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIVR | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.77 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. ASCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than ASCI's maximum drawdown of -11.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and ASCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -11.22% | -64.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.25% | -2.85% | -34.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.85% | -2.39% | -45.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.64% | — | — |
Volatility
SIVR vs. ASCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | ASCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.84% | 18.68% | +40.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.17% | 18.68% | +17.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 18.68% | +13.19% |
SIVR vs. ASCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ASCI's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. ASCI - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.75% | 0.80% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and ASCI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ASCI.
ASCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while ASCI is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.70% for ASCI.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and ASCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer