ASCI vs. DLS
ASCI (abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF) and DLS (WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. ASCI is actively managed, while DLS is passively managed. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ASCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DLS.
Performance
ASCI vs. DLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASCI achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than DLS's 8.42% return.
ASCI
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DLS
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $161.45K | $105.04K | $93.90K | |
| $1.54M | $1.48M | $1.54M |
ASCI vs. DLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 3.57% | 1.37% |
DLS WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend | 8.42% | 4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASCI and DLS is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASCI vs. DLS — Risk / Return Rank
ASCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DLS
ASCI vs. DLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF (ASCI) and WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASCI | DLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASCI vs. DLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASCI drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, smaller than the maximum DLS drawdown of -63.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCI and DLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASCI | DLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -63.13% | +51.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.31% | -1.58% | -4.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -13.56% | +10.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility
ASCI vs. DLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASCI | DLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.19% | 13.89% | +5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 15.63% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 16.38% | +2.81% |
ASCI vs. DLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DLS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASCI vs. DLS - Dividend Comparison
ASCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than DLS's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCI abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF | 0.77% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DLS WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend | 3.51% | 3.87% | 4.56% | 4.29% | 4.96% | 3.29% | 2.50% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 2.79% | 3.29% | 2.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASCI and DLS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DLS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DLS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ASCI.
DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.77% for ASCI.
They also come from different issuers: abrdn and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ASCI and 0.58% for DLS.
Find the right allocation for ASCI and DLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer