SITM vs. VRT
SITM (SiTime Corporation) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. SITM operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, SITM returned 43.34%/yr vs 62.98%/yr for VRT. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SITM vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SITM having a 88.08% return and VRT slightly lower at 85.57%.
SITM
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- YTD
- 88.08%
- 6M
- 83.53%
- 1Y
- 222.72%
- 3Y*
- 81.68%
- 5Y*
- 43.34%
- 10Y*
- —
VRT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 85.57%
- 6M
- 61.97%
- 1Y
- 160.87%
- 3Y*
- 142.34%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- —
SITM vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SITM SiTime Corporation | 88.08% | 64.63% | 75.73% | 20.13% | -65.26% | 161.36% | 338.94% | 96.15% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SITM and VRT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.45 |
Fundamentals
SITM:
$17.50B
VRT:
$117.86B
SITM:
-$0.94
VRT:
$3.99
SITM:
45.11
VRT:
10.84
SITM:
15.10
VRT:
27.77
SITM:
$379.91M
VRT:
$10.84B
SITM:
$211.60M
VRT:
$3.92B
SITM:
-$13.71M
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SITM vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
SITM
VRT
SITM vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SiTime Corporation (SITM) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SITM | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.41 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.33 | 6.53 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.94 | 18.20 | -0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SITM | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 2.79 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 1.03 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.00 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SITM vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SITM drawdown since its inception was -78.12%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SITM and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SITM | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.12% | -71.24% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.59% | -24.78% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.26% | -61.28% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.12% | -71.24% | -6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.31% | -20.11% | -6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.81% | -16.22% | -20.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.47% | 8.89% | +3.58% |
Volatility
SITM vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
SiTime Corporation (SITM) has a higher volatility of 22.72% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.60%. This indicates that SITM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SITM | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.72% | 16.60% | +6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.94% | 45.55% | +10.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.55% | 58.11% | +18.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 61.81% | +14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.56% | 54.61% | +25.95% |
Dividends
SITM vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
SITM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SITM SiTime Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
SITM vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SiTime Corporation and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SITM vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
SITM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a gross profit of 66.96M and revenue of 113.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
SITM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported an operating income of -12.34M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
SITM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a net income of -5.22M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SITM and VRT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SITM has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to VRT (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SITM dropped -78.12% vs VRT's -71.24%.
SITM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SITM and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer