PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIMS vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIMS vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 23.49% return.


SIMS

1D
-2.82%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
9.29%
6M
7.06%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*

XLE

1D
0.74%
1M
-7.80%
YTD
23.49%
6M
24.07%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIMS vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
9.29%23.75%-0.27%7.43%-27.13%9.00%29.88%35.30%-18.07%0.03%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
23.49%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SIMS and XLE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between SIMS and XLE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIMS vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIMS
XLE

Industrials

48.6%

-

Technology

24.6%

-

Energy

10.7%
100.0%

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%

-

Utilities

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

SIMS
48.6%
XLE

-

Technology

SIMS
24.6%
XLE

-

Energy

SIMS
10.7%
XLE
100.0%

Communication Services

SIMS
5.9%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

SIMS
3.6%
XLE

-

Utilities

SIMS
3.5%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

SIMS
3.1%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

SIMS

-

XLE

-

Financial Services

SIMS

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

SIMS

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

SIMS

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIMS vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMS
SIMS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMS vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIMSXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.18

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

6.53

-1.12

SIMS vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMS and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIMS vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIMSXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.97%

-71.26%

+27.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.79%

-14.05%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.78%

-20.14%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.97%

-26.04%

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-12.32%

+8.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.00%

-17.96%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.09%

4.69%

+1.40%

Volatility

SIMS vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.12%. This indicates that SIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIMSXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

7.12%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

16.82%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

20.93%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.26%

25.98%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.05%

29.60%

-3.55%

SIMS vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIMS vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than XLE's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
0.55%0.66%0.88%1.49%1.48%0.97%0.58%1.24%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.79%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIMS and XLE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIMS has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to XLE (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMS dropped -43.97% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 18.87% vs 0.30% for SIMS. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 18.87% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SIMS.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.55% for SIMS.

SIMS is categorized as Global Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. SIMS tracks S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SIMS and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIMS and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer