SIMS vs. PID
SIMS (SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SIMS tracks the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index while PID tracks the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIMS returned 0.71%/yr vs 8.28%/yr for PID. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIMS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
SIMS vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 5.45% return.
SIMS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 39.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
SIMS vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF | 13.06% | 23.75% | -0.27% | 7.43% | -27.13% | 9.00% | 29.88% | 35.30% | -18.07% | 0.03% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 5.45% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -6.48% | 24.49% | -6.56% | 25.87% | -11.46% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIMS and PID is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SIMS and PID shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIMS vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIMS
PID
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
SIMS
PID
Technology
SIMS
PID
Energy
SIMS
PID
Communication Services
SIMS
PID
Consumer Cyclical
SIMS
PID
Basic Materials
SIMS
PID
Utilities
SIMS
PID
Consumer Defensive
SIMS
-
PID
Financial Services
SIMS
-
PID
Healthcare
SIMS
-
PID
Real Estate
SIMS
-
PID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIMS vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
SIMS
PID
SIMS vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIMS | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 2.16 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 7.36 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIMS | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.66 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.60 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.27 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SIMS vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and PID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIMS | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -66.34% | +22.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.79% | -7.47% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.78% | -13.34% | -15.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.97% | -22.97% | -21.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -2.19% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -13.04% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.03% | 2.18% | +3.85% |
Volatility
SIMS vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.75%. This indicates that SIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIMS | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 2.75% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.95% | 7.62% | +7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 9.70% | +13.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 13.97% | +11.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 17.84% | +8.18% |
SIMS vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIMS vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than PID's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF | 0.57% | 0.66% | 0.88% | 1.49% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.58% | 1.24% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIMS and PID have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIMS has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMS dropped -43.97% vs PID's -66.34%.
On 5-year performance, PID leads with 8.28% vs 0.71% for SIMS. On fees, SIMS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PID has performed better with a 8.28% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIMS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.
PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.57% for SIMS.
SIMS tracks S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SIMS and 0.56% for PID.
SIMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIMS and PID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer