SIMS vs. LDRI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SIMS (SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF) and LDRI (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIMS is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, while LDRI is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SIMS returned 32.84% vs 3.55% for LDRI. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SIMS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LDRI.

Performance

SIMS vs. LDRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMS achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than LDRI's 1.37% return.

SIMS

• 1D: -2.82%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 9.29%
• 6M: 7.06%
• 1Y: 32.84%
• 3Y*: 11.20%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: —

LDRI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 3.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIMS vs. LDRI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF	9.29%	23.75%	-5.78%
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF	1.37%	5.94%	0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SIMS and LDRI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024	-0.04

Return for Risk

SIMS vs. LDRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMS

SIMS Risk / Return Rank: 40
SIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 37

LDRI

LDRI Risk / Return Rank: 74
LDRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
LDRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LDRI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LDRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
LDRI Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMS vs. LDRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIMS	LDRI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.84	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.67	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.39	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	5.96	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.41	15.28	-9.87

SIMS vs. LDRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the LDRI Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMS and LDRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIMS vs. LDRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMS drawdown since its inception was -43.97%, which is greater than LDRI's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMS and LDRI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIMS	LDRI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.97%	-0.85%	-43.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.79%	-0.60%	-15.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.04%	-0.58%	-3.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.00%	-0.20%	-15.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.09%	0.23%	+5.86%

Volatility

SIMS vs. LDRI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) at 0.64%. This indicates that SIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIMS	LDRI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.08%	0.64%	+7.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.94%	1.48%	+13.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.05%	1.95%	+22.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.26%	2.29%	+22.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.05%	2.29%	+23.76%

SIMS vs. LDRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIMS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRI's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIMS vs. LDRI - Dividend Comparison

SIMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than LDRI's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF	3.54%	4.23%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF	0.55%	0.66%	0.88%	1.49%	1.48%	0.97%	0.58%	1.24%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIMS and LDRI in my portfolio?

SIMS and LDRI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIMS or LDRI?

SIMS has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to LDRI (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMS dropped -43.97% vs LDRI's -0.85%.

Which ETF is better, SIMS or LDRI?

On 1-year performance, SIMS leads with 32.84% vs 3.55% for LDRI. On fees, LDRI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, LDRI has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIMS or LDRI?

Over the 1-year period, SIMS has performed better with a 32.84% return vs 3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIMS or LDRI?

LDRI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SIMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIMS or LDRI?

LDRI has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.55% for SIMS.

What is the main difference between SIMS and LDRI?

SIMS is categorized as Global Equities, while LDRI is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SIMS tracks S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index, while LDRI tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SIMS and 0.10% for LDRI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.