SIMO vs. HBM
SIMO (Silicon Motion Technology Corporation) and HBM (Hudbay Minerals Inc.) are both stocks. SIMO operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while HBM operates in Copper (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, SIMO returned 22.83%/yr vs 19.31%/yr for HBM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIMO vs. HBM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a 204.36% return, which is significantly higher than HBM's 40.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has outperformed HBM with an annualized return of 22.83%, while HBM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.31% annualized return.
SIMO
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 204.36%
- 6M
- 221.67%
- 1Y
- 323.36%
- 3Y*
- 62.27%
- 5Y*
- 37.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.83%
HBM
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 40.23%
- 6M
- 49.02%
- 1Y
- 189.83%
- 3Y*
- 78.89%
- 5Y*
- 31.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.31%
SIMO vs. HBM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 204.36% | 76.91% | -8.94% | -4.91% | -30.38% | 101.83% | -1.81% | 51.81% | -33.11% | 27.14% |
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 40.23% | 145.46% | 47.03% | 9.24% | -29.87% | 3.82% | 69.50% | -11.77% | -46.20% | 54.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIMO and HBM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2009 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
SIMO:
$2.38B
HBM:
$11.09B
SIMO:
$17.93
HBM:
$1.65
SIMO:
15.64
HBM:
16.83
SIMO:
0.12
HBM:
0.12
SIMO:
2.37
HBM:
4.68
SIMO:
2.62
HBM:
3.13
SIMO:
$997.60M
HBM:
$2.37B
SIMO:
$485.91M
HBM:
$828.54M
SIMO:
$146.89M
HBM:
$1.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIMO vs. HBM — Risk / Return Rank
SIMO
HBM
SIMO vs. HBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIMO | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.44 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.40 | 5.28 | +7.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.77 | 16.41 | +20.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIMO vs. HBM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, roughly equal to the maximum HBM drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and HBM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIMO | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -92.21% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.26% | -36.16% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.84% | -41.11% | -11.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.49% | -63.33% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.49% | -86.34% | +29.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -12.68% | +4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.36% | -52.45% | +20.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.84% | 11.62% | -2.78% |
Volatility
SIMO vs. HBM - Volatility Comparison
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) have volatilities of 24.96% and 25.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIMO | HBM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.96% | 25.87% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.16% | 47.72% | +10.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.32% | 59.13% | +11.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.36% | 55.51% | -5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.25% | 58.82% | -13.57% |
Dividends
SIMO vs. HBM - Dividend Comparison
SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than HBM's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.22% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.52% |
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 0.71% | 2.16% | 3.70% | 0.82% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.89% | 2.45% | 3.45% | 1.68% | 1.51% | 1.88% |
Financials
SIMO vs. HBM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Hudbay Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SIMO vs. HBM - Profitability Comparison
SIMO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 136.77M and revenue of 278.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
HBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 340.81M and revenue of 745.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.
SIMO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 31.71M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.
HBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 297.62M and revenue of 745.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.9%.
SIMO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 47.75M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
HBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 187.76M and revenue of 745.43M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIMO and HBM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HBM has higher volatility (25.87%) compared to SIMO (24.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMO dropped -93.19% vs HBM's -92.21%.
SIMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 3.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIMO and HBM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer