SIMO vs. MU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU).

Performance

SIMO vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SIMO vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation	21.60%	76.91%	-8.94%	-4.91%	-30.38%	101.83%	-1.81%	51.81%	-33.11%	27.14%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	18.42%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-22.84%	87.59%

Fundamentals

EPS SIMO : $21.91 MU : $21.30
PE Ratio SIMO : 5.12 MU : 15.86
PEG Ratio SIMO : 0.03 MU : 0.06
PS Ratio SIMO : 0.71 MU : 6.58
Total Revenue (TTM) SIMO : $885.63M MU : $58.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) SIMO : $427.51M MU : $33.96B
EBITDA (TTM) SIMO : $123.21M MU : $25.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a 21.60% return, which is significantly higher than MU's 18.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 14.06%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 41.16% annualized return.

SIMO

• 1D: 6.49%
• 1M: -13.11%
• YTD: 21.60%
• 6M: 19.58%
• 1Y: 127.84%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 14.57%
• 10Y*: 14.06%

MU

• 1D: 4.98%
• 1M: -18.04%
• YTD: 18.42%
• 6M: 102.21%
• 1Y: 289.74%
• 3Y*: 78.45%
• 5Y*: 30.25%
• 10Y*: 41.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SIMO vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMO

SIMO Risk / Return Rank: 92
SIMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SIMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SIMO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SIMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SIMO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIMO vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIMO	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	4.49	-2.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	3.83	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.52	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.84	9.36	-4.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.26	31.94	-18.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIMO vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 4.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMO and MU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIMO	MU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	4.49	-2.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.61	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.85	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.25	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between SIMO and MU is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SIMO vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than MU's 0.15% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation	1.78%	2.16%	3.70%	0.82%	2.31%	1.62%	2.89%	2.45%	3.45%	1.68%	1.51%	1.88%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.15%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SIMO vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIMO	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.19%	-98.25%	+5.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.26%	-30.28%	+4.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.49%	-57.63%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.49%	-57.63%	+1.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.48%	-26.80%	+5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.63%	-58.46%	+25.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.59%	8.87%	+0.72%

Volatility

SIMO vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is 15.94%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 23.12%. This indicates that SIMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIMO	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.94%	23.12%	-7.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.62%	49.17%	-9.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.50%	65.00%	-12.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.79%	49.86%	-5.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.05%	48.59%	-6.54%

Financials

SIMO vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SIMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 136.77M and revenue of 278.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

SIMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 31.71M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

SIMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 47.75M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.