PortfoliosLab logo
SIMO vs. MU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SIMO and MU is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SIMO vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SIMO:

-0.34

MU:

-0.43

Sortino Ratio

SIMO:

-0.22

MU:

-0.14

Omega Ratio

SIMO:

0.97

MU:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

SIMO:

-0.31

MU:

-0.41

Martin Ratio

SIMO:

-0.55

MU:

-0.66

Ulcer Index

SIMO:

31.28%

MU:

35.49%

Daily Std Dev

SIMO:

47.68%

MU:

63.84%

Max Drawdown

SIMO:

-93.19%

MU:

-98.25%

Current Drawdown

SIMO:

-29.77%

MU:

-37.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SIMO:

$2.16B

MU:

$107.71B

EPS

SIMO:

$2.71

MU:

$4.32

PE Ratio

SIMO:

23.46

MU:

22.31

PEG Ratio

SIMO:

-4.43

MU:

0.13

PS Ratio

SIMO:

2.77

MU:

3.44

PB Ratio

SIMO:

2.80

MU:

2.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

SIMO:

$779.96M

MU:

$31.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SIMO:

$363.75M

MU:

$10.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

SIMO:

$117.00M

MU:

$12.53B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIMO achieves a 17.40% return, which is significantly higher than MU's 14.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 8.35%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.


SIMO

YTD

17.40%

1M

41.31%

6M

21.03%

1Y

-16.32%

3Y*

-9.77%

5Y*

9.22%

10Y*

8.35%

MU

YTD

14.43%

1M

22.43%

6M

-1.80%

1Y

-27.17%

3Y*

10.16%

5Y*

15.48%

10Y*

13.42%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Micron Technology, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SIMO vs. MU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SIMO is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SIMO is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SIMO is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SIMO is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SIMO is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SIMO is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MU is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MU is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MU is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MU is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MU is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MU is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SIMO vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SIMO Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is comparable to the MU Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIMO and MU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SIMO vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than MU's 0.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
3.21%3.70%0.82%2.31%1.63%2.91%2.46%3.48%1.70%1.53%1.91%2.54%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.48%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SIMO vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and MU.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SIMO vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) has a higher volatility of 13.32% compared to Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) at 11.35%. This indicates that SIMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SIMO vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
166.49M
8.05B
(SIMO) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SIMO vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
47.1%
36.8%
(SIMO) Gross Margin
(MU) Gross Margin
SIMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 78.37M and revenue of 166.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.1%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.96B and revenue of 8.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

SIMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 9.77M and revenue of 166.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.77B and revenue of 8.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.

SIMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 19.46M and revenue of 166.49M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 8.05B, resulting in a net margin of 19.7%.