SIMO vs. MU
SIMO (Silicon Motion Technology Corporation) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, SIMO returned 21.82%/yr vs 53.62%/yr for MU. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIMO vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SIMO having a 224.99% return and MU slightly higher at 228.49%. Over the past 10 years, SIMO has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 21.82%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 53.62% annualized return.
SIMO
- 1D
- -8.22%
- 1M
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 161.25%
- YTD
- 224.99%
- 1Y
- 315.15%
- 3Y*
- 72.30%
- 5Y*
- 39.53%
- 10Y*
- 21.82%
MU
- 1D
- -4.32%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- 6M
- 171.07%
- YTD
- 228.49%
- 1Y
- 653.64%
- 3Y*
- 145.44%
- 5Y*
- 65.03%
- 10Y*
- 53.62%
SIMO vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 224.99% | 76.91% | -8.94% | -4.91% | -30.38% | 101.83% | -1.81% | 51.81% | -33.11% | 27.14% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 228.49% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIMO and MU is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2005 | 0.41 |
The correlation between SIMO and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SIMO:
$10.05B
MU:
$1.06T
SIMO:
$17.91
MU:
$44.42
SIMO:
16.72
MU:
21.10
SIMO:
0.13
MU:
0.08
SIMO:
2.53
MU:
11.79
SIMO:
2.80
MU:
10.62
SIMO:
$997.60M
MU:
$90.27B
SIMO:
$485.91M
MU:
$65.51B
SIMO:
$146.89M
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIMO vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
SIMO
MU
SIMO vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIMO | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.67 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.09 | 21.79 | -9.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.27 | 79.32 | -44.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIMO vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIMO drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIMO and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIMO | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -98.25% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.26% | -30.28% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.84% | -57.63% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.49% | -57.63% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.49% | -57.63% | +1.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.10% | -22.78% | +11.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -58.07% | +25.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.99% | 8.55% | +0.44% |
Volatility
SIMO vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is 25.03%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.57%. This indicates that SIMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIMO | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.03% | 33.57% | -8.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.66% | 62.25% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.48% | 76.01% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.36% | 54.80% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.72% | 50.67% | -4.95% |
Dividends
SIMO vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
SIMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than MU's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 0.67% | 2.16% | 3.70% | 0.82% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.89% | 2.45% | 3.45% | 1.68% | 1.51% | 1.88% |
Financials
SIMO vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SIMO vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
SIMO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 136.77M and revenue of 278.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
SIMO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 31.71M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
SIMO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation reported a net income of 47.75M and revenue of 278.46M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIMO and MU have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (33.57%) compared to SIMO (25.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIMO dropped -93.19% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.70 vs 4.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIMO and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer