SILJ vs. VDC
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 8.82%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for VDC. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
SILJ vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 8.82%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.03% annualized return.
SILJ
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 45.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
VDC
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 8.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
SILJ vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -1.77% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 10.55% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and VDC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | 0.13 |
The correlation between SILJ and VDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SILJ vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SILJ
VDC
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SILJ
VDC
Financial Services
SILJ
VDC
-
Consumer Defensive
SILJ
VDC
Communication Services
SILJ
VDC
-
Consumer Cyclical
SILJ
-
VDC
Energy
SILJ
-
VDC
-
Healthcare
SILJ
-
VDC
Industrials
SILJ
-
VDC
Real Estate
SILJ
-
VDC
-
Technology
SILJ
-
VDC
-
Utilities
SILJ
-
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
VDC
SILJ vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SILJ | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.11 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 0.79 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 1.60 | +4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -34.24% | -44.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.16% | -9.28% | -29.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.16% | -11.78% | -27.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.55% | -16.55% | -37.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -25.31% | -44.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.56% | -4.37% | -28.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.40% | -3.73% | -37.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.17% | 4.57% | +10.60% |
Volatility
SILJ vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 20.76% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.62%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.76% | 4.62% | +16.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.36% | 10.02% | +37.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.54% | 12.57% | +43.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 13.17% | +31.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.41% | 14.66% | +31.75% |
SILJ vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILJ vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than VDC's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.04% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.08% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SILJ and VDC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to VDC (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 10-year performance, SILJ leads with 8.82% vs 8.03% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 8.82% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 2.04% for SILJ.
SILJ is categorized as Silver, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.09% for VDC.
SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer