PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILJ vs. SLJY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SILJ vs. SLJY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than SLJY's 7.71% return.


SILJ

1D
-5.24%
1M
2.57%
YTD
6.61%
6M
16.40%
1Y
111.95%
3Y*
47.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
10.08%

SLJY

1D
-4.01%
1M
3.34%
YTD
7.71%
6M
15.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. SLJY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
6.61%73.37%
SLJY
Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF
7.71%43.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and SLJY is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SILJ vs. SLJY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SLJY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. SLJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SILJSLJYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.99

SILJ vs. SLJY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SILJSLJYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.49

-1.41

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. SLJY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than SLJY's maximum drawdown of -30.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and SLJY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILJSLJYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.04%

-30.60%

-48.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.80%

-21.65%

-5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-9.60%

-31.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.06%

Volatility

SILJ vs. SLJY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILJSLJYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.90%

49.59%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.35%

49.59%

-5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.24%

49.59%

-3.35%

SILJ vs. SLJY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SLJY's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SILJ vs. SLJY - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than SLJY's 16.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
1.88%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%
SLJY
Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF
16.71%6.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SILJ and SLJY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SLJY.

SLJY has the higher dividend yield at 16.71%, compared with 1.88% for SILJ.

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while SLJY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.75% for SLJY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SILJ and SLJY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer