SILJ vs. SLJY
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and SLJY (Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while SLJY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. SILJ is passively managed, while SLJY is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SLJY.
Performance
SILJ vs. SLJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than SLJY's 7.71% return.
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
SLJY
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILJ vs. SLJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 6.61% | 73.37% |
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 7.71% | 43.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and SLJY is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. SLJY — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
SLJY
SILJ vs. SLJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SILJ | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SILJ | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 1.49 | -1.41 |
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. SLJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than SLJY's maximum drawdown of -30.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and SLJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -30.60% | -48.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.80% | -21.65% | -5.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.43% | -9.60% | -31.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.06% | — | — |
Volatility
SILJ vs. SLJY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | SLJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.90% | 49.59% | +5.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.35% | 49.59% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 49.59% | -3.35% |
SILJ vs. SLJY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SLJY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILJ vs. SLJY - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than SLJY's 16.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 16.71% | 6.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SILJ and SLJY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SLJY.
SLJY has the higher dividend yield at 16.71%, compared with 1.88% for SILJ.
SILJ is categorized as Silver, while SLJY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.75% for SLJY.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and SLJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer