SILJ vs. MUU
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
SILJ vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.76%
- 1M
- -9.71%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -10.68%
- 1Y
- 80.90%
- 3Y*
- 45.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILJ vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -10.58% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and MUU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SILJ vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SILJ | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -26.28% | -52.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.41% | -26.28% | -9.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.39% | -10.19% | -31.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.86% | — | — |
Volatility
SILJ vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.43% | 295.32% | -237.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.93% | 295.32% | -250.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.51% | 295.32% | -248.81% |
SILJ vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILJ vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SILJ and MUU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
SILJ is categorized as Silver, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer