PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SILJ
ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF
11.35%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-27.95%-5.65%
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
8.38%181.76%14.51%6.92%-11.26%-22.21%30.36%40.16%-13.27%1.62%
Different Trading Currencies

SILJ is traded in USD, while G2XJ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the G2XJ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly higher than G2XJ.DE's 8.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed G2XJ.DE with an annualized return of 15.15%, while G2XJ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 18.14% annualized return.


SILJ

1D
3.67%
1M
-22.88%
YTD
11.35%
6M
34.60%
1Y
163.12%
3Y*
44.62%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
15.15%

G2XJ.DE

1D
8.70%
1M
-15.93%
YTD
8.38%
6M
30.52%
1Y
127.88%
3Y*
50.23%
5Y*
24.31%
10Y*
18.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than G2XJ.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

G2XJ.DE
G2XJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SILJG2XJ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.98

2.60

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

2.81

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

4.21

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.52

13.82

+1.70

SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and G2XJ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SILJG2XJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98

2.60

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.62

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.45

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.43

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and G2XJ.DE is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while G2XJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SILJ
ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF
1.80%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than G2XJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and G2XJ.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SILJG2XJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.04%

-49.96%

-29.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.71%

-29.24%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.09%

-40.82%

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-49.96%

-20.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.55%

-15.55%

-8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.66%

-25.33%

-16.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.25%

8.84%

+1.41%

Volatility

SILJ vs. G2XJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) have volatilities of 20.08% and 20.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SILJG2XJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.08%

20.22%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.92%

40.47%

+6.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.05%

48.84%

+6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.06%

38.84%

+5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.61%

39.77%

+6.84%