PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILJ vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SILJ vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed DBE with an annualized return of 10.08%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.


SILJ

1D
-5.24%
1M
2.57%
YTD
6.61%
6M
16.40%
1Y
111.95%
3Y*
47.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
10.08%

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILJ vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
6.61%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-27.95%-5.65%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and DBE is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.18

The correlation between SILJ and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SILJ vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILJ vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SILJDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

5.89

-2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

11.53

-3.54

SILJ vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SILJDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.43

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.67

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.43

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.09

-0.01

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILJDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.04%

-86.69%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.71%

-14.41%

-20.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

-23.89%

-10.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.47%

-38.74%

-16.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.06%

-60.84%

-9.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.80%

-30.27%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-57.31%

+15.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.06%

7.35%

+6.71%

Volatility

SILJ vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) at 12.95%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILJDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.69%

12.95%

+5.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.24%

30.86%

+14.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.90%

34.97%

+19.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.35%

29.39%

+14.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.24%

28.33%

+17.91%

SILJ vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

SILJ vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
1.88%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


SILJ and DBE have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to DBE (12.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 10-year performance, DBE leads with 12.03% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, DBE has been the lower-risk option at 12.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBE has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.88% for SILJ.

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while DBE is Oil & Gas. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SILJ and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer