PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIL vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIL vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIL vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
7.85%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-18.35%40.30%34.78%-22.42%1.67%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
-1.04%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's -1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 14.65%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.87% annualized return.


SIL

1D
7.82%
1M
-23.68%
YTD
7.85%
6M
27.11%
1Y
131.18%
3Y*
45.13%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
14.65%

XYLD

1D
2.01%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
-1.04%
6M
5.33%
1Y
10.53%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIL vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SIL vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIL vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SILXYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

0.76

+1.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

1.22

+1.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.25

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

1.10

+2.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.73

6.46

+7.27

SIL vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SILXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

0.76

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.62

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.55

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.57

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between SIL and XYLD is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SIL vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than XYLD's 10.98% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.10%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.98%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Drawdowns

SIL vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and XYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SILXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.99%

-33.46%

-49.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.91%

-10.14%

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

-18.66%

-36.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.04%

-33.46%

-29.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.68%

-3.39%

-20.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.79%

-3.76%

-48.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.53%

1.72%

+7.81%

Volatility

SIL vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 19.45% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 4.01%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SILXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.45%

4.01%

+15.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.52%

5.82%

+36.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.72%

13.99%

+35.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.63%

11.31%

+27.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.74%

14.23%

+25.51%