SIL vs. FMST
SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index, while FMST (Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock) is a stock. Over the past year, SIL returned 47.84% vs -31.01% for FMST. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIL vs. FMST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a -10.96% return, which is significantly higher than FMST's -16.04% return.
SIL
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- 6M
- -20.89%
- YTD
- -10.96%
- 1Y
- 47.84%
- 3Y*
- 40.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
FMST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 14.10%
- 6M
- -21.59%
- YTD
- -16.04%
- 1Y
- -31.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIL vs. FMST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -10.96% | 139.75% |
FMST Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock | -16.04% | 37.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIL and FMST is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIL vs. FMST — Risk / Return Rank
SIL
FMST
SIL vs. FMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIL | FMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.01 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | -0.46 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | -0.70 | +3.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIL vs. FMST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, which is greater than FMST's maximum drawdown of -74.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and FMST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIL | FMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.99% | -74.54% | -8.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.20% | -67.91% | +30.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.00% | -67.16% | +30.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.32% | -50.00% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.57% | 44.25% | -27.68% |
Volatility
SIL vs. FMST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) is 15.75%, while Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST) has a volatility of 21.38%. This indicates that SIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIL | FMST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.75% | 21.38% | -5.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.24% | 59.50% | -15.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.93% | 95.23% | -42.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.99% | 118.79% | -78.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.82% | 118.79% | -78.97% |
Dividends
SIL vs. FMST - Dividend Comparison
SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while FMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMST Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.37% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIL and FMST have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMST has higher volatility (21.38%) compared to SIL (15.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIL dropped -82.99% vs FMST's -74.54%.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIL and FMST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer