FMST vs. DNN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN).

Performance

FMST vs. DNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FMST vs. DNN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMST Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock	-16.98%	60.61%
DNN Denison Mines Corp	32.71%	46.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FMST : $25.26M DNN : $3.18B
EPS FMST : -$0.27 DNN : -$0.24
PB Ratio FMST : 0.73 DNN : 8.65
Total Revenue (TTM) FMST : $0.00 DNN : $4.92M
Gross Profit (TTM) FMST : $0.00 DNN : -$23.92M
EBITDA (TTM) FMST : -$3.43M DNN : -$171.24M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMST achieves a -16.98% return, which is significantly lower than DNN's 32.71% return.

FMST

• 1D: 6.02%
• 1M: -22.47%
• YTD: -16.98%
• 6M: -39.73%
• 1Y: 117.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DNN

• 1D: 6.97%
• 1M: -15.55%
• YTD: 32.71%
• 6M: 28.36%
• 1Y: 171.54%
• 3Y*: 47.95%
• 5Y*: 24.50%
• 10Y*: 20.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FMST vs. DNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMST

FMST Risk / Return Rank: 72
FMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FMST Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FMST Martin Ratio Rank: 64

DNN

DNN Risk / Return Rank: 93
DNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DNN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DNN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMST vs. DNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMST	DNN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	2.72	-1.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	3.11	-0.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.37	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	5.61	-4.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.34	15.68	-13.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMST vs. DNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMST Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the DNN Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMST and DNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMST	DNN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	2.72	-1.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	-0.07	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between FMST and DNN is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FMST vs. DNN - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMST nor DNN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FMST vs. DNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMST drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, smaller than the maximum DNN drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMST and DNN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMST	DNN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.37%	-98.96%	+29.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.37%	-29.50%	-39.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.53%	-81.69%	+14.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.34%	-85.10%	+41.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.75%	10.55%	+35.20%

Volatility

FMST vs. DNN - Volatility Comparison

Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST) has a higher volatility of 24.05% compared to Denison Mines Corp (DNN) at 20.08%. This indicates that FMST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMST	DNN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.05%	20.08%	+3.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.49%	45.53%	+24.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	128.52%	63.51%	+65.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.96%	64.41%	+62.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.96%	64.17%	+62.79%

Financials