FMST vs. AP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST) and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP).

Performance

FMST vs. AP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST) and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FMST vs. AP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMST Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock	-16.98%	60.61%
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation	26.08%	113.20%

Fundamentals

EPS FMST : -$0.27 AP : -$0.26
Total Revenue (TTM) FMST : $0.00 AP : $426.31M
Gross Profit (TTM) FMST : $0.00 AP : $85.33M
EBITDA (TTM) FMST : -$3.43M AP : $33.95M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMST achieves a -16.98% return, which is significantly lower than AP's 26.08% return.

FMST

• 1D: 6.02%
• 1M: -22.47%
• YTD: -16.98%
• 6M: -39.73%
• 1Y: 117.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AP

• 1D: 4.02%
• 1M: -26.23%
• YTD: 26.08%
• 6M: 193.45%
• 1Y: 209.68%
• 3Y*: 39.98%
• 5Y*: -2.69%
• 10Y*: -6.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FMST vs. AP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMST

FMST Risk / Return Rank: 72
FMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FMST Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FMST Martin Ratio Rank: 64

AP

AP Risk / Return Rank: 90
AP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AP Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMST vs. AP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST) and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMST	AP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	2.36	-1.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.87	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.33	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	4.13	-2.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.34	9.28	-6.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMST vs. AP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMST Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the AP Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMST and AP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMST	AP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	2.36	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	-0.01	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between FMST and AP is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FMST vs. AP - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMST nor AP has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMST Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.45%	2.69%	7.02%

Drawdowns

FMST vs. AP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMST drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, smaller than the maximum AP drawdown of -98.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMST and AP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMST	AP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.37%	-98.06%	+28.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.37%	-50.80%	-18.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-90.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-95.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.53%	-82.60%	+15.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.34%	-52.13%	+8.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.75%	22.61%	+23.14%

Volatility

FMST vs. AP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. Common stock (FMST) is 24.05%, while Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a volatility of 34.84%. This indicates that FMST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMST	AP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.05%	34.84%	-10.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.49%	64.50%	+5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	128.52%	89.50%	+39.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.96%	73.95%	+53.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.96%	71.83%	+55.13%

Financials