SIF vs. WES
SIF (SIFCO Industries, Inc.) and WES (Western Midstream Partners, LP) are both stocks. SIF operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while WES operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, SIF returned 11.87%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for WES. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SIF vs. WES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIF achieves a 362.01% return, which is significantly higher than WES's 25.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SIF having a 11.87% annualized return and WES not far behind at 11.29%.
SIF
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 318.51%
- YTD
- 362.01%
- 1Y
- 474.16%
- 3Y*
- 116.80%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.58%
WES
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 19.70%
- YTD
- 25.64%
- 1Y
- 29.07%
- 3Y*
- 29.22%
- 5Y*
- 28.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.99M | $3.16M | $2.46M | |
| $41.68M | $35.36M | $50.07M |
SIF vs. WES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIF SIFCO Industries, Inc. | 362.01% | 57.40% | -21.92% | 110.21% | -66.77% | -22.62% | 112.66% | 14.49% | -48.12% | -13.07% |
WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 25.64% | 12.77% | 43.58% | 19.46% | 29.29% | 72.31% | -19.13% | -22.65% | -20.23% | -8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIF and WES is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
SIF:
$161.23M
WES:
$19.24B
SIF:
$1.20
WES:
$3.06
SIF:
21.45
WES:
15.20
SIF:
1.31
WES:
1.12
SIF:
1.67
WES:
4.55
SIF:
3.85
WES:
5.32
SIF:
$95.32M
WES:
$4.05B
SIF:
$18.94M
WES:
$2.79B
SIF:
$12.65M
WES:
$2.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIF vs. WES — Risk / Return Rank
SIF
WES
SIF vs. WES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIFCO Industries, Inc. (SIF) and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIF | WES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.24 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.55 | 2.52 | +13.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.38 | 5.85 | +35.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIF vs. WES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIF drawdown since its inception was -94.46%, roughly equal to the maximum WES drawdown of -93.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIF and WES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIF | WES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.46% | -93.66% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.90% | -11.03% | -16.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.30% | -16.65% | -40.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.37% | -23.54% | -56.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.64% | -91.90% | +6.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.61% | -0.90% | -26.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.70% | -28.27% | -27.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.48% | 4.74% | +5.74% |
Volatility
SIF vs. WES - Volatility Comparison
SIFCO Industries, Inc. (SIF) has a higher volatility of 24.50% compared to Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) at 5.36%. This indicates that SIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIF | WES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.50% | 5.36% | +19.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.46% | 16.17% | +56.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.42% | 20.75% | +67.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.48% | 28.37% | +41.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.71% | 46.46% | +27.25% |
Dividends
SIF vs. WES - Dividend Comparison
SIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIF SIFCO Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 7.90% | 9.13% | 8.33% | 8.52% | 6.80% | 5.69% | 11.25% | 12.45% | 8.28% | 5.43% | 4.03% | 3.86% |
Financials
SIF vs. WES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SIFCO Industries, Inc. and Western Midstream Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SIF vs. WES - Profitability Comparison
SIF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SIFCO Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.66M and revenue of 26.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.
WES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 859.34M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.5%.
SIF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SIFCO Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.
WES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported an operating income of 469.19M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.8%.
SIF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SIFCO Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 2.65M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.
WES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a net income of 350.28M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 31.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIF and WES have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIF has higher volatility (24.50%) compared to WES (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIF dropped -94.46% vs WES's -93.66%.
SIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.91 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIF and WES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer