SIEGY vs. LRCX
SIEGY (Siemens Aktiengesellschaft) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. SIEGY operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, SIEGY returned 15.98%/yr vs 48.23%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIEGY vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIEGY achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 114.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SIEGY has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 15.98%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 48.23% annualized return.
SIEGY
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.88%
- 5Y*
- 15.84%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 24.16%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 303.12%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
SIEGY vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIEGY Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | 11.68% | 48.14% | 6.32% | 39.98% | -18.92% | 22.99% | 23.99% | 19.10% | -17.30% | 21.90% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIEGY and LRCX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2014 | 0.45 |
The correlation between SIEGY and LRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SIEGY:
$240.57B
LRCX:
$463.20B
SIEGY:
€4.91
LRCX:
$5.29
SIEGY:
26.95
LRCX:
69.37
SIEGY:
1.00
LRCX:
5.25
SIEGY:
2.61
LRCX:
21.46
SIEGY:
3.23
LRCX:
43.76
SIEGY:
€80.02B
LRCX:
$21.68B
SIEGY:
€31.09B
LRCX:
$10.84B
SIEGY:
€14.55B
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIEGY vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
SIEGY
LRCX
SIEGY vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (SIEGY) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIEGY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.63 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 15.26 | -14.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 51.20 | -47.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIEGY vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIEGY drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIEGY and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIEGY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.15% | -87.90% | +33.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -20.01% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | -47.10% | +17.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.02% | -56.39% | +10.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.15% | -56.39% | +2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.37% | 0.00% | -5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -28.17% | +15.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.14% | 5.95% | +1.19% |
Volatility
SIEGY vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (SIEGY) is 10.01%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 21.52%. This indicates that SIEGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIEGY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 21.52% | -11.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.19% | 43.63% | -17.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.87% | 52.78% | -19.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.74% | 46.57% | -14.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.56% | 44.92% | -15.36% |
Dividends
SIEGY vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
SIEGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than LRCX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
SIEGY Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | 2.07% | 1.94% | 2.64% | 2.43% | 2.42% | 1.81% | 10.83% | 2.44% | 2.86% | 6.82% | 5.76% | 2.87% |
Financials
SIEGY vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Siemens Aktiengesellschaft and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SIEGY vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
SIEGY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Siemens Aktiengesellschaft reported a gross profit of 7.81B and revenue of 20.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
SIEGY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Siemens Aktiengesellschaft reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 20.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
SIEGY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Siemens Aktiengesellschaft reported a net income of 2.06B and revenue of 20.08B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIEGY and LRCX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to SIEGY (10.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIEGY dropped -54.15% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIEGY and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer