SICNX vs. SWLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX).
SICNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2008. SWLSX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Oct 3, 2005.
Performance
SICNX vs. SWLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SICNX vs. SWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 1.58% | 31.57% | 9.04% | 20.00% | -15.31% | 11.01% | 4.64% | 19.16% | -18.30% | 25.48% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | -9.26% | 19.69% | 29.41% | 38.27% | -27.00% | 29.03% | 29.03% | 31.02% | -7.93% | 29.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SICNX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than SWLSX's -9.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SICNX has underperformed SWLSX with an annualized return of 8.35%, while SWLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.47% annualized return.
SICNX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
SWLSX
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -9.26%
- 6M
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- 18.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SICNX vs. SWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SICNX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than SWLSX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SICNX vs. SWLSX — Risk / Return Rank
SICNX
SWLSX
SICNX vs. SWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SICNX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 0.87 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.41 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.24 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 4.32 | +1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SICNX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.87 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.70 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.52 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between SICNX and SWLSX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SICNX vs. SWLSX - Dividend Comparison
SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% | 2.67% | 3.42% | 2.86% | 1.03% | 3.56% | 2.86% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 2.04% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | 1.29% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 2.07% | 7.77% | 1.07% | 5.32% | 12.35% | 7.92% | 4.46% | 17.08% |
Drawdowns
SICNX vs. SWLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SICNX drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than SWLSX's maximum drawdown of -49.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICNX and SWLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SICNX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -49.89% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -16.17% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.11% | -31.32% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.62% | -31.32% | -9.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.28% | -12.84% | +3.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -7.98% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 4.65% | -1.37% |
Volatility
SICNX vs. SWLSX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) at 7.17%. This indicates that SICNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SICNX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 7.17% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 13.03% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.25% | 22.89% | -4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 21.04% | -5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 20.79% | -4.39% |