PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SICNX vs. SFNNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund (SFNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SICNX achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly lower than SFNNX's 20.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SICNX has underperformed SFNNX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while SFNNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.77% annualized return.


SICNX

1D
2.90%
1M
1.73%
6M
6.23%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
22.57%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
8.95%
ALL TIME*
5.37%

SFNNX

1D
2.95%
1M
3.46%
6M
12.42%
YTD
20.52%
1Y
41.01%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
11.77%
ALL TIME*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SICNX
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
12.10%31.57%9.04%20.00%-15.31%11.01%4.64%19.16%-18.30%25.48%
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund
20.52%41.06%2.27%19.88%-7.95%14.38%4.35%18.09%-13.96%23.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SICNX and SFNNX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2008

0.95

The correlation between SICNX and SFNNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SICNX vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SICNX
SICNX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SICNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SICNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SFNNX
SFNNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SFNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SFNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SICNXSFNNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.74

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

12.87

-6.72

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SICNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the SFNNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SICNX and SFNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SICNX drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICNX and SFNNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SICNXSFNNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-59.60%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-10.63%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-13.78%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.11%

-25.66%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

-40.23%

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.83%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.11%

-11.89%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

3.08%

+0.44%

Volatility

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund (SFNNX) have volatilities of 5.28% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SICNXSFNNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

5.08%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.34%

13.58%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

15.68%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

15.76%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.31%

17.07%

-0.76%

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SICNX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison

SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Equity Index Fund
4.24%5.11%3.61%3.26%2.92%3.81%2.42%3.69%3.51%2.70%3.21%2.92%
SICNX
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%2.61%2.67%3.42%2.86%1.03%3.56%2.86%2.61%2.50%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SICNX and SFNNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SICNX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to SFNNX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SICNX dropped -55.78% vs SFNNX's -59.60%.

SFNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SICNX and SFNNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer