SICNX vs. SFNNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX).
SICNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2008. SFNNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Apr 1, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SICNX or SFNNX.
Correlation
The correlation between SICNX and SFNNX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SICNX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SICNX:
0.70
SFNNX:
0.33
SICNX:
1.03
SFNNX:
0.53
SICNX:
1.13
SFNNX:
1.07
SICNX:
0.96
SFNNX:
0.42
SICNX:
3.01
SFNNX:
1.27
SICNX:
3.06%
SFNNX:
3.31%
SICNX:
13.18%
SFNNX:
12.72%
SICNX:
-55.95%
SFNNX:
-62.39%
SICNX:
-9.59%
SFNNX:
-9.97%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SICNX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than SFNNX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SICNX has underperformed SFNNX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while SFNNX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.46% annualized return.
SICNX
6.72%
-2.93%
-3.73%
8.41%
4.82%
4.85%
SFNNX
1.52%
-3.00%
-2.56%
3.39%
6.00%
5.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SICNX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SICNX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SICNX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SICNX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison
Neither SICNX nor SFNNX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 0.00% | 2.67% | 3.42% | 2.86% | 1.04% | 3.56% | 2.86% | 2.33% | 2.49% | 2.04% | 1.66% | 2.61% |
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 0.00% | 3.27% | 2.92% | 3.81% | 2.43% | 3.68% | 3.51% | 2.70% | 3.20% | 2.91% | 3.60% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
SICNX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SICNX drawdown since its inception was -55.95%, smaller than the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICNX and SFNNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SICNX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) at 3.15%. This indicates that SICNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.