PortfoliosLab logo
SICNX vs. SFNNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SICNX and SFNNX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

70.00%75.00%80.00%85.00%90.00%95.00%100.00%105.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
100.58%
100.84%
SICNX
SFNNX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SICNX:

1.08

SFNNX:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

SICNX:

1.54

SFNNX:

1.15

Omega Ratio

SICNX:

1.21

SFNNX:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

SICNX:

1.33

SFNNX:

0.92

Martin Ratio

SICNX:

4.45

SFNNX:

2.67

Ulcer Index

SICNX:

4.06%

SFNNX:

4.75%

Daily Std Dev

SICNX:

16.75%

SFNNX:

16.35%

Max Drawdown

SICNX:

-55.95%

SFNNX:

-62.47%

Current Drawdown

SICNX:

0.00%

SFNNX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SICNX achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly higher than SFNNX's 13.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SICNX has underperformed SFNNX with an annualized return of 5.54%, while SFNNX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.20% annualized return.


SICNX

YTD

14.45%

1M

13.86%

6M

11.92%

1Y

15.65%

5Y*

13.48%

10Y*

5.54%

SFNNX

YTD

13.22%

1M

13.11%

6M

9.14%

1Y

10.33%

5Y*

15.27%

10Y*

6.20%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SICNX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SICNX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for SICNX: current value is 0.86%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SICNX: 0.86%
Expense ratio chart for SFNNX: current value is 0.25%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SFNNX: 0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SICNX vs. SFNNX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SICNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SICNX is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SICNX is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SICNX is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SICNX is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SICNX is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SICNX is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SFNNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SFNNX is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SFNNX is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SFNNX is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SFNNX is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SFNNX is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SFNNX is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for SICNX, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
SICNX: 1.08
SFNNX: 0.78
The chart of Sortino ratio for SICNX, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
SICNX: 1.54
SFNNX: 1.15
The chart of Omega ratio for SICNX, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
SICNX: 1.21
SFNNX: 1.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for SICNX, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
SICNX: 1.33
SFNNX: 0.92
The chart of Martin ratio for SICNX, currently valued at 4.45, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
SICNX: 4.45
SFNNX: 2.67

The current SICNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the SFNNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SICNX and SFNNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.08
0.78
SICNX
SFNNX

Dividends

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison

SICNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than SFNNX's 3.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SICNX
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
2.28%2.61%2.67%3.42%2.86%1.04%3.56%2.86%2.33%2.49%2.04%1.66%
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
3.19%3.61%3.26%2.92%3.81%2.42%3.69%3.51%2.70%3.21%2.92%3.60%

Drawdowns

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SICNX drawdown since its inception was -55.95%, smaller than the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -62.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICNX and SFNNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay00
SICNX
SFNNX

Volatility

SICNX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) have volatilities of 10.61% and 10.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.61%
10.36%
SICNX
SFNNX