PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SICNX vs. SWISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SICNX vs. SWISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SICNX achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly higher than SWISX's 10.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SICNX having a 9.73% annualized return and SWISX not far ahead at 10.17%.


SICNX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.65%
YTD
11.97%
6M
11.67%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
9.73%

SWISX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.18%
YTD
10.79%
6M
10.26%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SICNX vs. SWISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SICNX
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
11.97%31.57%9.04%20.00%-15.31%11.01%4.64%19.16%-18.30%25.48%
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
10.79%31.59%3.54%18.13%-14.30%11.25%8.14%21.87%-13.38%25.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SICNX and SWISX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2008

0.98

The correlation between SICNX and SWISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SICNX vs. SWISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SICNX
SICNX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SICNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SICNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SWISX
SWISX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SWISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SWISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWISX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SICNX vs. SWISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SICNXSWISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.25

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

8.43

-1.09

SICNX vs. SWISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SICNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the SWISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SICNX and SWISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SICNX vs. SWISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SICNX drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum SWISX drawdown of -60.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICNX and SWISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SICNXSWISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-60.65%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-11.39%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-13.68%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.11%

-29.42%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

-33.83%

-6.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-14.78%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.04%

+0.46%

Volatility

SICNX vs. SWISX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) at 4.84%. This indicates that SICNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SICNXSWISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

4.84%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.53%

12.98%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

15.63%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

16.37%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

16.86%

-0.37%

SICNX vs. SWISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SICNX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than SWISX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SICNX vs. SWISX - Dividend Comparison

SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SICNX
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%2.61%2.67%3.42%2.86%1.03%3.56%2.86%2.61%2.50%2.04%
SWISX
Schwab International Index Fund
3.20%3.55%3.29%3.31%2.73%3.34%1.88%3.09%3.15%2.71%3.19%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SICNX and SWISX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SICNX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to SWISX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SICNX dropped -55.78% vs SWISX's -60.65%.

SWISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SICNX and SWISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer