PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SICNX vs. IVFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SICNX vs. IVFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SICNX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than IVFIX's 6.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SICNX has outperformed IVFIX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while IVFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.83% annualized return.


SICNX

1D
0.54%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.59%
6M
7.48%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
8.87%

IVFIX

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.36%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SICNX vs. IVFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SICNX
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
10.59%31.57%9.04%20.00%-15.31%11.01%4.64%19.16%-18.30%25.48%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
6.24%31.79%1.91%11.05%-2.54%11.58%-1.74%20.15%-11.96%14.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SICNX and IVFIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2008

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between SICNX and IVFIX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SICNX vs. IVFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SICNX
SICNX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SICNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SICNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

IVFIX
IVFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IVFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IVFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SICNX vs. IVFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SICNXIVFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.71

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.36

7.31

-0.95

SICNX vs. IVFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SICNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the IVFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SICNX and IVFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SICNXIVFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.57

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.73

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.47

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.21

+0.06

Drawdowns

SICNX vs. IVFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SICNX drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than IVFIX's maximum drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICNX and IVFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SICNXIVFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-51.49%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-6.97%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-10.75%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.11%

-21.29%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

-33.46%

-7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-5.67%

+4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-11.62%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.59%

+0.88%

Volatility

SICNX vs. IVFIX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) have volatilities of 5.01% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SICNXIVFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

4.83%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

9.35%

+4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.69%

12.10%

+4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

13.13%

+3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

14.78%

+1.71%

SICNX vs. IVFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SICNX and IVFIX have an expense ratio of 0.86%.


Dividends

SICNX vs. IVFIX - Dividend Comparison

SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
3.58%3.37%4.44%4.01%3.99%3.67%3.62%3.98%4.97%4.17%3.38%3.95%
SICNX
Schwab International Core Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%2.61%2.67%3.42%2.86%1.03%3.56%2.86%2.61%2.50%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SICNX and IVFIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SICNX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to IVFIX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SICNX dropped -55.78% vs IVFIX's -51.49%.

IVFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SICNX and IVFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer