IVFIX vs. AWPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) and AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX).
IVFIX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Jun 3, 2008. AWPAX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jun 1, 1994.
Performance
IVFIX vs. AWPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IVFIX vs. AWPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVFIX Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 6.75% | 31.79% | 1.91% | 11.05% | -2.54% | 11.58% | -1.74% | 20.15% | -11.96% | 14.63% |
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund | -4.95% | 13.57% | -0.32% | 13.09% | -26.80% | 9.20% | 29.55% | 26.88% | -17.50% | 34.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVFIX achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than AWPAX's -4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IVFIX has outperformed AWPAX with an annualized return of 7.22%, while AWPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.
IVFIX
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -4.48%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
AWPAX
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -4.95%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IVFIX vs. AWPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVFIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than AWPAX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IVFIX vs. AWPAX — Risk / Return Rank
IVFIX
AWPAX
IVFIX vs. AWPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) and AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVFIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 0.46 | +1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 0.76 | +1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.10 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 0.53 | +3.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.54 | 2.07 | +16.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVFIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.46 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | -0.03 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.33 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.32 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between IVFIX and AWPAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IVFIX vs. AWPAX - Dividend Comparison
IVFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, while AWPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVFIX Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 3.09% | 3.37% | 4.44% | 4.01% | 3.99% | 3.67% | 3.62% | 3.98% | 4.97% | 4.17% | 3.38% | 3.95% |
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 7.00% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 14.44% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IVFIX vs. AWPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVFIX drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum AWPAX drawdown of -63.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVFIX and AWPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVFIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -63.00% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.47% | -13.44% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.29% | -38.13% | +16.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | -38.13% | +4.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -13.22% | +8.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -18.85% | +7.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.45% | -1.44% |
Volatility
IVFIX vs. AWPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) is 4.59%, while AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) has a volatility of 8.77%. This indicates that IVFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IVFIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 8.77% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 12.25% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 17.35% | -2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 17.12% | -4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 16.67% | -1.93% |