SICIX vs. USCCX
Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) and USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX).
SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003. USCCX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jun 7, 2012.
Performance
SICIX vs. USCCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SICIX vs. USCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
USCCX USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund | -0.36% | 10.98% | 5.80% | 9.35% | -10.84% | 4.33% | 8.79% | 12.12% | -3.25% | 8.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SICIX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly higher than USCCX's -0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SICIX has underperformed USCCX with an annualized return of 3.36%, while USCCX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.79% annualized return.
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
USCCX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 8.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.46%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SICIX vs. USCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SICIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than USCCX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SICIX vs. USCCX — Risk / Return Rank
SICIX
USCCX
SICIX vs. USCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) and USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SICIX | USCCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 1.86 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | 2.66 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.60 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 10.70 | -1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SICIX | USCCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.86 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.68 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 1.03 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.05 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between SICIX and USCCX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SICIX vs. USCCX - Dividend Comparison
SICIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than USCCX's 4.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
USCCX USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund | 4.89% | 4.81% | 4.36% | 3.76% | 4.16% | 3.94% | 4.06% | 2.67% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.18% | 3.79% |
Drawdowns
SICIX vs. USCCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SICIX drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, which is greater than USCCX's maximum drawdown of -15.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICIX and USCCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SICIX | USCCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.62% | -15.15% | -12.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -3.21% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.94% | -15.15% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.61% | -15.15% | +3.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -2.95% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -2.11% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 0.78% | -0.11% |
Volatility
SICIX vs. USCCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) is 1.24%, while USAA Cornerstone Conservative Fund (USCCX) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that SICIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SICIX | USCCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 1.76% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 2.71% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 4.52% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.87% | 5.14% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.89% | 4.64% | -0.75% |