PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SICIX vs. AMBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SICIX vs. AMBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SICIX achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than AMBFX's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SICIX has underperformed AMBFX with an annualized return of 3.47%, while AMBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.47% annualized return.


SICIX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
3.47%

AMBFX

1D
0.24%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.06%
6M
10.70%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SICIX vs. AMBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.55%8.12%5.52%5.29%-6.23%4.13%2.62%9.36%-2.07%5.13%
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
10.06%18.67%15.25%13.81%-11.93%16.00%11.06%19.45%-2.69%14.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SICIX and AMBFX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.80

The correlation between SICIX and AMBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SICIX vs. AMBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SICIX
SICIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AMBFX
AMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SICIX vs. AMBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SICIXAMBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.57

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.70

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

16.73

-6.50

SICIX vs. AMBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SICIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the AMBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SICIX and AMBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SICIXAMBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.96

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.95

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.98

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.78

+0.02

Drawdowns

SICIX vs. AMBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SICIX drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, smaller than the maximum AMBFX drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SICIX and AMBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SICIXAMBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.62%

-35.05%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-7.00%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.21%

-10.64%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.94%

-18.65%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.61%

-22.31%

+10.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-3.58%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.54%

-0.86%

Volatility

SICIX vs. AMBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) is 0.74%, while American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) has a volatility of 2.67%. This indicates that SICIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SICIXAMBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

2.67%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

6.86%

-4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

8.73%

-5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

10.50%

-6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.90%

10.67%

-6.77%

SICIX vs. AMBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SICIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than AMBFX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SICIX vs. AMBFX - Dividend Comparison

SICIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than AMBFX's 7.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
7.72%8.47%7.40%2.20%2.52%4.50%4.56%4.19%6.20%4.85%4.46%5.81%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.83%2.87%3.67%2.80%4.69%3.46%1.84%2.91%1.80%1.81%1.64%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SICIX and AMBFX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBFX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to SICIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SICIX dropped -27.62% vs AMBFX's -35.05%.

AMBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SICIX and AMBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer