PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHY vs. UTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHY vs. UTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHY achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than UTWO's 0.33% return.


SHY

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
1.65%

UTWO

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.63%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHY vs. UTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.43%4.95%3.92%4.16%-0.73%
UTWO
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
0.33%4.79%3.71%3.45%-0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SHY and UTWO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022

0.96

The correlation between SHY and UTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHY vs. UTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHY
SHY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

UTWO
UTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
UTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHY vs. UTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYUTWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

2.33

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.10

3.84

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.47

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.50

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.21

12.89

+2.32

SHY vs. UTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the UTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHY and UTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYUTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.33

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

1.45

-0.16

Drawdowns

SHY vs. UTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHY drawdown since its inception was -5.71%, which is greater than UTWO's maximum drawdown of -2.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHY and UTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYUTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-2.04%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.89%

-0.90%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-1.08%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.38%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-0.49%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

0.24%

-0.02%

Volatility

SHY vs. UTWO - Volatility Comparison

iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) have volatilities of 0.35% and 0.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYUTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.35%

0.36%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

0.92%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34%

1.35%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.98%

2.07%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.57%

2.07%

-0.50%

SHY vs. UTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SHY and UTWO have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SHY vs. UTWO - Dividend Comparison

SHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than UTWO's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.68%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%
UTWO
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
3.50%3.63%4.22%4.39%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SHY and UTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UTWO has higher volatility (0.36%) compared to SHY (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHY dropped -5.71% vs UTWO's -2.04%.

On 3-year performance, SHY leads with 4.03% vs 3.78% for UTWO. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SHY has performed better with a 4.03% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHY and UTWO have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

SHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 3.50% for UTWO.

SHY tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while UTWO tracks ICE BofA Current 2 Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and US Benchmark Series.

SHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHY and UTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer