PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SHY vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SHY vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHY is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SHY returned 1.63%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for NLR. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

SHY vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHY achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SHY has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 1.63%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.

SHY

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.74%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.70%
10Y*
1.63%

NLR

1D
0.91%
1M
-12.54%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
-6.08%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
31.16%
5Y*
20.16%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHY vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF		0.34%4.95%3.92%4.16%-3.88%-0.71%3.03%3.38%1.46%0.26%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		-0.79%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%3.49%0.20%4.94%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SHY and NLR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2007

-0.05

The correlation between SHY and NLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

Often compared with SHY:
SHY vs. SGOVSHY vs. VGSHSHY vs. SHVSHY vs. TLTSHY vs. IEFSHY vs. BILSHY vs. BSV
Often compared with NLR:
NLR vs. URANLR vs. NUKZNLR vs. URNMNLR vs. OKLONLR vs. GRIDNLR vs. URANNLR vs. SMH

Return for Risk

SHY vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SHY
SHY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHY vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SHYNLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.51
0.63

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.11
1.13

+2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.13

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

1.04

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.12

2.08

+13.04

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHY vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHY and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SHYNLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

0.63

+1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.69

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.53

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.16

+1.12

Drawdowns

SHY vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHY drawdown since its inception was -5.71%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHY and NLR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SHYNLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-65.05%

+59.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.89%

-25.80%

+24.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-30.48%

+29.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

-30.48%

+24.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

-34.35%

+28.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-25.03%

+24.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-35.71%

+35.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

12.87%

-12.65%

Volatility

SHY vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) is 0.38%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that SHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SHYNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

13.36%

-12.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.95%

33.24%

-32.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

42.96%

-41.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

29.43%

-27.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.57%

24.14%

-22.57%

SHY vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHY vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

SHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than NLR's 2.57% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		2.57%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF		3.69%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

SHY and NLR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to SHY (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHY dropped -5.71% vs NLR's -65.05%.

On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 12.72% vs 1.63% for SHY. On fees, SHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 1.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

SHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.57% for NLR.

SHY is categorized as Government Bonds, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. SHY tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHY and 0.56% for NLR.

SHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHY and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer