PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHW vs. RACE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHW vs. RACE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly higher than RACE's -1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has underperformed RACE with an annualized return of 13.58%, while RACE has yielded a comparatively higher 25.24% annualized return.


SHW

1D
0.13%
1M
6.01%
YTD
-1.61%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
-4.65%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
13.58%

RACE

1D
-2.93%
1M
10.50%
YTD
-1.73%
6M
-1.08%
1Y
-21.64%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
25.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHW vs. RACE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
-1.61%-3.83%9.90%32.73%-31.96%44.90%27.05%49.70%-3.23%54.11%
RACE
Ferrari N.V.
-1.73%-11.65%26.34%59.12%-16.68%13.32%39.71%67.87%-4.47%81.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SHW and RACE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SHW:

$78.72B

RACE:

$62.93B

EPS

SHW:

$10.42

RACE:

€8.98

PE Ratio

SHW:

30.45

RACE:

34.15

PEG Ratio

SHW:

2.96

RACE:

1.77

PS Ratio

SHW:

3.31

RACE:

7.58

PB Ratio

SHW:

17.77

RACE:

13.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHW:

$23.94B

RACE:

€7.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHW:

$11.76B

RACE:

€3.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

SHW:

$4.29B

RACE:

€3.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHW vs. RACE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHW
SHW Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHW Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

RACE
RACE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RACE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RACE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RACE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RACE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
RACE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHW vs. RACE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHWRACEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.90

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

-0.59

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.99

-0.93

-0.06

SHW vs. RACE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHW Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is higher than the RACE Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHW and RACE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHW vs. RACE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, which is greater than RACE's maximum drawdown of -46.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and RACE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHWRACEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.02%

-46.67%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.36%

-39.22%

+17.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.69%

-39.22%

+13.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.46%

-39.22%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.46%

-39.22%

-3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.53%

-29.85%

+10.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.63%

-11.50%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.28%

25.02%

-14.74%

Volatility

SHW vs. RACE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is 9.00%, while Ferrari N.V. (RACE) has a volatility of 12.55%. This indicates that SHW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RACE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHWRACEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

12.55%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.26%

24.53%

-5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.46%

35.36%

-9.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.27%

29.55%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.58%

29.55%

-2.97%

Dividends

SHW vs. RACE - Dividend Comparison

SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than RACE's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RACE
Ferrari N.V.
2.40%1.85%0.61%0.59%0.69%0.40%0.54%0.70%0.88%0.61%0.79%0.00%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
1.00%0.98%0.84%0.78%1.01%0.62%0.73%0.77%0.87%0.83%1.25%1.03%

Financials

SHW vs. RACE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Ferrari N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.67B
1.86B
(SHW) Total Revenue
(RACE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SHW values in USD, RACE values in EUR

SHW vs. RACE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Ferrari N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%52.0%20222023202420252026
49.1%
51.8%
Portfolio components
SHW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

RACE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported a gross profit of 961.64M and revenue of 1.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

SHW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

RACE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported an operating income of 554.10M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

SHW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

RACE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported a net income of 414.57M and revenue of 1.86B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SHW and RACE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RACE has higher volatility (12.55%) compared to SHW (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs RACE's -46.67%.

SHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHW and RACE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer