SHV vs. XCCC
SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while XCCC is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHV returned 4.64%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for XCCC. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for XCCC.
Performance
SHV vs. XCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHV achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than XCCC's -0.05% return.
SHV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
XCCC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHV vs. XCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.42% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 1.02% |
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.05% | 7.25% | 13.01% | 20.57% | -5.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHV and XCCC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHV vs. XCCC — Risk / Return Rank
SHV
XCCC
SHV vs. XCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHV | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +18.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +147.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 53.77 | 1.20 | +52.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 431.38 | 1.11 | +430.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2,419.80 | 3.72 | +2,416.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHV | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49 | 1.09 | +18.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 11.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 8.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.50 | 0.96 | +3.54 |
Drawdowns
SHV vs. XCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHV drawdown since its inception was -0.45%, smaller than the maximum XCCC drawdown of -10.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHV and XCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHV | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -10.99% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -5.11% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.03% | -10.99% | +10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.05% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -1.93% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 1.53% | -1.53% |
Volatility
SHV vs. XCCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) is 0.05%, while BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that SHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHV | XCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 1.51% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 4.02% | -3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 5.25% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.29% | 8.82% | -8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 8.82% | -8.54% |
SHV vs. XCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XCCC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHV vs. XCCC - Dividend Comparison
SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than XCCC's 10.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 10.05% | 10.06% | 10.68% | 12.05% | 7.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHV and XCCC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XCCC has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHV dropped -0.45% vs XCCC's -10.99%.
On 3-year performance, XCCC leads with 10.79% vs 4.64% for SHV. On fees, SHV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XCCC has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.
XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 3.83% for SHV.
SHV is categorized as Government Bonds, while XCCC is High Yield Bonds. SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHV and 0.40% for XCCC.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHV and XCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer