SHUS vs. QCON
SHUS (Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHUS is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Syntax Advisors, while QCON is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. SHUS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
SHUS vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SHUS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHUS vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 2.73% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
SHUS vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHUS
QCON
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SHUS
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
SHUS
QCON
-
Consumer Defensive
SHUS
QCON
-
Healthcare
SHUS
QCON
-
Industrials
SHUS
QCON
Financial Services
SHUS
QCON
Energy
SHUS
QCON
-
Communication Services
SHUS
QCON
-
Utilities
SHUS
QCON
Real Estate
SHUS
QCON
-
Basic Materials
SHUS
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHUS vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
SHUS
QCON
SHUS vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHUS | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHUS | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SHUS vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHUS | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.09% | 0.00% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | 0.00% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | 0.00% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | — | — |
Volatility
SHUS vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHUS | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.01% | 0.00% | +10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 0.00% | +12.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 0.00% | +12.61% |
SHUS vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHUS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHUS vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 1.27% | 1.37% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QCON is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCON is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SHUS.
SHUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
SHUS is categorized as Hedge Fund, while QCON is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Syntax Advisors and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SHUS and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for SHUS and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer