SHUS vs. QQHG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SHUS (Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF) and QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SHUS returned 18.95% vs 19.25% for QQHG. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SHUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQHG.

Performance

SHUS vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than QQHG's 8.92% return.

SHUS

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 8.10%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 1Y: 18.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.87%

QQHG

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -0.33%
• 6M: 7.62%
• YTD: 8.92%
• 1Y: 19.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	$45.08K	$107.17K	$66.44K
SHUS Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF	$376.99	$481.64	$2.74K

SHUS vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SHUS Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF	11.99%	11.89%
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	8.92%	20.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SHUS and QQHG is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

SHUS vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHUS

SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 76
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

QQHG

QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 76
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHUS vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHUS	QQHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.80	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.54	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.31	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	3.13	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.87	10.27	-0.40

SHUS vs. QQHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the QQHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHUS and QQHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHUS vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and QQHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHUS	QQHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.09%	-6.18%	-7.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-6.18%	-0.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-2.50%	+2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-1.15%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	1.88%	+0.04%

Volatility

SHUS vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) is 2.87%, while Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that SHUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHUS	QQHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	3.61%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.39%	8.37%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	10.76%	-0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.41%	10.35%	+2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.41%	10.35%	+2.06%

SHUS vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHUS vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than QQHG's 0.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	0.26%	0.17%	0.00%
SHUS Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF	1.23%	1.37%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHUS and QQHG in my portfolio?

SHUS and QQHG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHUS or QQHG?

QQHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to SHUS (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHUS dropped -14.09% vs QQHG's -6.18%.

Which ETF is better, SHUS or QQHG?

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 19.25% vs 18.95% for SHUS. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SHUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHUS or QQHG?

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 19.25% return vs 18.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHUS or QQHG?

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SHUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHUS or QQHG?

SHUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.26% for QQHG.

What is the main difference between SHUS and QQHG?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SHUS and 0.45% for QQHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.