SHUS vs. ARB
SHUS (Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF) and ARB (AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds. SHUS is actively managed, while ARB is passively managed. Over the past year, SHUS returned 17.10% vs 4.90% for ARB. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHUS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for ARB.
Performance
SHUS vs. ARB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly higher than ARB's 1.70% return.
SHUS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- —
SHUS vs. ARB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 8.58% | 10.89% | -2.65% |
ARB AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF | 1.70% | 6.05% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHUS and ARB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024 | 0.32 |
SHUS vs. ARB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHUS
ARB
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SHUS
ARB
Consumer Cyclical
SHUS
ARB
Consumer Defensive
SHUS
ARB
Healthcare
SHUS
ARB
Industrials
SHUS
ARB
Financial Services
SHUS
ARB
Energy
SHUS
ARB
Communication Services
SHUS
ARB
Utilities
SHUS
ARB
Real Estate
SHUS
ARB
Basic Materials
SHUS
ARB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHUS vs. ARB — Risk / Return Rank
SHUS
ARB
SHUS vs. ARB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHUS | ARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 7.17 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 20.90 | -12.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHUS | ARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.70 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.95 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
SHUS vs. ARB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, which is greater than ARB's maximum drawdown of -5.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and ARB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHUS | ARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.09% | -5.60% | -8.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -0.69% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.49% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -0.94% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.24% | +1.70% |
Volatility
SHUS vs. ARB - Volatility Comparison
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) at 1.28%. This indicates that SHUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHUS | ARB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 1.28% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 2.38% | +4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.01% | 2.89% | +7.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 4.40% | +8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 4.40% | +8.21% |
SHUS vs. ARB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHUS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARB's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHUS vs. ARB - Dividend Comparison
SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than ARB's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARB AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.43% | 0.43% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 4.18% | 0.00% | 2.87% |
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 1.27% | 1.37% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHUS and ARB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHUS has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to ARB (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHUS dropped -14.09% vs ARB's -5.60%.
On 1-year performance, SHUS leads with 17.10% vs 4.90% for ARB. On fees, SHUS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ARB has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SHUS has performed better with a 17.10% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHUS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for ARB.
SHUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.43% for ARB.
They also come from different issuers: Syntax Advisors and Water Island Capital Partners LP. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SHUS and 0.87% for ARB.
SHUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHUS and ARB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer