PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHRT vs. TSLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHRT vs. TSLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHRT achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly higher than TSLT's -40.17% return.


SHRT

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
-16.68%
6M
-15.90%
1Y
-21.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLT

1D
-3.44%
1M
-24.84%
YTD
-40.17%
6M
-48.80%
1Y
-14.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHRT vs. TSLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
-16.68%-0.91%-1.44%-5.51%
TSLT
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF
-40.17%-29.49%54.17%22.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SHRT and TSLT is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023

-0.33

SHRT vs. TSLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SHRT
TSLT

Basic Materials

25.3%

-

Industrials

18.3%

-

Healthcare

14.0%

-

Technology

12.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
100.0%

Energy

8.6%

-

Communication Services

5.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

-

Financial Services

0.6%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Basic Materials

SHRT
25.3%
TSLT

-

Industrials

SHRT
18.3%
TSLT

-

Healthcare

SHRT
14.0%
TSLT

-

Technology

SHRT
12.4%
TSLT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SHRT
10.2%
TSLT
100.0%

Energy

SHRT
8.6%
TSLT

-

Communication Services

SHRT
5.6%
TSLT

-

Consumer Defensive

SHRT
5.5%
TSLT

-

Financial Services

SHRT
0.6%
TSLT

-

Utilities

SHRT
0.1%
TSLT

-

Real Estate

SHRT

-

TSLT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHRT vs. TSLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHRT
SHRT Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SHRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRT Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRT Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLT
TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHRT vs. TSLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHRTTSLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.04

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

-0.26

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.94

-0.52

-1.42

SHRT vs. TSLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHRT Sharpe Ratio is -1.59, which is lower than the TSLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHRT and TSLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHRT vs. TSLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHRT drawdown since its inception was -25.98%, smaller than the maximum TSLT drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHRT and TSLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHRTTSLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.98%

-83.16%

+57.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.21%

-55.08%

+32.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.27%

-70.94%

+45.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-50.65%

+42.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.04%

27.86%

-16.82%

Volatility

SHRT vs. TSLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) is 4.02%, while T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) has a volatility of 28.11%. This indicates that SHRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHRTTSLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

28.11%

-24.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

56.58%

-45.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

87.52%

-74.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.81%

116.81%

-104.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.81%

116.81%

-104.00%

SHRT vs. TSLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHRT has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLT's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHRT vs. TSLT - Dividend Comparison

SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
0.08%0.07%0.85%0.27%
TSLT
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHRT and TSLT have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLT has higher volatility (28.11%) compared to SHRT (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHRT dropped -25.98% vs TSLT's -83.16%.

On 1-year performance, TSLT leads with -14.18% vs -21.32% for SHRT. On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLT has performed better with a -14.18% return vs -21.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.

SHRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.

SHRT is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TSLT is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gotham and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for SHRT and 1.05% for TSLT.

TSLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHRT and TSLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer